FKIE_CVE-2026-32887

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-20 22:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:36
Severity
7.4 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
Effect is a TypeScript framework that consists of several packages that work together to help build TypeScript applications. Prior to version 3.20.0, when using `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (or `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) inside a Next.js App Router route handler, any Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`-dependent API called from within an Effect fiber can read another concurrent request's context — or no context at all. Under production traffic, `auth()` from `@clerk/nextjs/server` returns a different user's session. Version 3.20.0 contains a fix for the issue.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2gExploit, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
effectful effect *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "effect",
          "vendor": "Effect-TS",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 3.20.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:effectful:effect:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "720488DF-FC4E-43E2-9D3B-5FB783EF8BEC",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.20.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Effect is a TypeScript framework that consists of several packages that work together to help build TypeScript applications. Prior to version 3.20.0, when using `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (or `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) inside a Next.js App Router route handler, any Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`-dependent API called from within an Effect fiber can read another concurrent request\u0027s context \u2014 or no context at all. Under production traffic, `auth()` from `@clerk/nextjs/server` returns a different user\u0027s session. Version 3.20.0 contains a fix for the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Effect es un framework de TypeScript que consta de varios paquetes que trabajan juntos para ayudar a construir aplicaciones TypeScript. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 3.20.0, al usar `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (o `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) dentro de un gestor de rutas del App Router de Next.js, cualquier API de Node.js dependiente de `AsyncLocalStorage` llamada desde dentro de una fibra de Effect puede leer el contexto de otra solicitud concurrente \u2014 o ning\u00fan contexto en absoluto. Bajo tr\u00e1fico de producci\u00f3n, `auth()` de `@clerk/nextjs/server` devuelve la sesi\u00f3n de un usuario diferente. La versi\u00f3n 3.20.0 contiene una soluci\u00f3n para el problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-32887",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:36:30.770",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.4,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-32887",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-03-25T13:36:39.114796Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-20T22:16:27.980",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-362"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.