FKIE_CVE-2026-45160
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-10 02:16 - Updated: 2026-06-10 20:02
Severity
Summary
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.7, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0.1, an out-of-bounds read flaw exists in the DHCP server option parser (parse_options() in components/lwip/apps/dhcpserver/dhcpserver.c) shipped with ESP-IDF's lwIP component. The parser walks the BOOTP/DHCP options field without validating that each option's length byte and declared payload length stay within the received packet buffer. A crafted DHCP request can cause the parser to read past the end of the options buffer into adjacent heap memory. The issue affects the DHCP server used by ESP-IDF's SoftAP and any configuration where the device runs as a DHCP server on a local network. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.8, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.7, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0.1, an out-of-bounds read flaw exists in the DHCP server option parser (parse_options() in components/lwip/apps/dhcpserver/dhcpserver.c) shipped with ESP-IDF\u0027s lwIP component. The parser walks the BOOTP/DHCP options field without validating that each option\u0027s length byte and declared payload length stay within the received packet buffer. A crafted DHCP request can cause the parser to read past the end of the options buffer into adjacent heap memory. The issue affects the DHCP server used by ESP-IDF\u0027s SoftAP and any configuration where the device runs as a DHCP server on a local network. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.8, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-45160",
"lastModified": "2026-06-10T20:02:44.950",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-10T02:16:32.520",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/2bf4dd12002dbae60a4b21abff010ecb2b8ee82b"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/2da2db43fd7e0bcff9e7b95f54f388296bb6f911"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/8b4b5d5301815198d177974ffc24848f47748248"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/9f713dbc94982d917f2d12964b233cd9efa4aeba"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/d51b1076092487e533eadf8b48c9c8579d3a6712"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/fba5f995436a3e3139f768b6d8f1a74d5ce1d318"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/security/advisories/GHSA-g764-gwc3-75m5"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…