FKIE_CVE-2026-48132

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-26 14:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 11:10
Summary
The Security Gateway does not correctly validate a length value in certain IKE packets when NAT-T is used (4500/UDP). As a result, a specially crafted or malformed packet can cause the VPN processing service to terminate unexpectedly, leading to denial of service (temporary interruption of VPN negotiations/traffic).
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Quantum Security Gateway",
          "vendor": "checkpoint",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 6 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 91 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 127 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All releases from R81.10 and below"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Security Gateway does not correctly validate a length value in certain IKE packets when NAT-T is used (4500/UDP). As a result, a specially crafted or malformed packet can cause the VPN processing service to terminate unexpectedly, leading to denial of service (temporary interruption of VPN negotiations/traffic)."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El Security Gateway no valida correctamente un valor de longitud en ciertos paquetes IKE cuando se utiliza NAT-T (4500/UDP). Como resultado, un paquete especialmente dise\u00f1ado o malformado puede provocar que el servicio de procesamiento de VPN termine inesperadamente, lo que lleva a una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (interrupci\u00f3n temporal de las negociaciones/tr\u00e1fico de VPN)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-48132",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-24T11:10:00.170",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-48132",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-02T14:09:04.979541Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-26T14:16:38.587",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
      "url": "https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184982"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@checkpoint.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-125"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…