FKIE_CVE-2026-65985

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-18 20:17 - Updated: 2026-08-19 19:17
Severity
6.0 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In 1.3.2 and earlier, the device-webapi-request Socket.IO handler in server/runtime/index.js permits an authenticated non-admin runtime user to control property.address, causing the FUXA server to issue an outbound HTTP or HTTPS request and return the response body to the requesting socket. The attacker can use the server as a read SSRF oracle against reachable internal services or cloud metadata endpoints, with impact depending on the FUXA host's deployment network. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.3.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/4fa47d0a2a856ed34f427f472fb4450f86e7749b
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2379
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.3
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-wrg6-49wh-46pw
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "FUXA",
          "vendor": "frangoteam",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.3.3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In 1.3.2 and earlier, the device-webapi-request Socket.IO handler in server/runtime/index.js permits an authenticated non-admin runtime user to control property.address, causing the FUXA server to issue an outbound HTTP or HTTPS request and return the response body to the requesting socket. The attacker can use the server as a read SSRF oracle against reachable internal services or cloud metadata endpoints, with impact depending on the FUXA host\u0027s deployment network. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.3."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-65985",
  "lastModified": "2026-08-19T19:17:22.863",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 6.0,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-65985",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-08-19T19:05:09.440755Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-08-18T20:17:20.740",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/4fa47d0a2a856ed34f427f472fb4450f86e7749b"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2379"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.3"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-wrg6-49wh-46pw"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-918"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.