FKIE_CVE-2026-84716

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-23 20:17 - Updated: 2026-09-24 07:16
Summary
A flaw was found in the automation-controller instance install-bundle endpoint. When a System Administrator downloads an execution/hop node's install bundle, the controller signs an X.509 certificate with the receptor mesh certificate authority in which the Common Name, DNS subject-alternative-name, and receptor node-id are taken verbatim from the caller-chosen instance hostname, with a hard-coded ten-year validity, a random serial, and no issuance log or revocation list. Because the hostname charset validator is case-insensitive while the uniqueness validator is case-sensitive, an administrator can register a case variant of an existing control node's hostname and obtain a mesh-CA-signed certificate that TLS peers, which match hostnames case-insensitively, accept as that control node. In managed/hosted deployments — where the customer holds controller superuser but the platform operator runs the mesh — this yields a long-lived, non-revocable mesh peer credential and, with an on-path position, TLS impersonation or interception of control/hybrid mesh nodes. It does not grant direct remote code execution, because receptor work submission is gated by a separate signing key not included in the bundle.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "automation-controller",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0:4.6.33-1.el8ap",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "automation-controller",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0:4.6.33-1.el9ap",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el10",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el10",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9",
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.6::el9"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "automation-controller",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0:4.7.17-1.el9ap",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "1789673739",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.7::el9"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "1789580684",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in the automation-controller instance\n                  install-bundle endpoint. When a System Administrator downloads\n                  an execution/hop node\u0027s install bundle, the controller signs an\n                  X.509 certificate with the receptor mesh certificate authority\n                  in which the Common Name, DNS subject-alternative-name, and\n                  receptor node-id are taken verbatim from the caller-chosen\n                  instance hostname, with a hard-coded ten-year validity, a random\n                  serial, and no issuance log or revocation list. Because the\n                  hostname charset validator is case-insensitive while the\n                  uniqueness validator is case-sensitive, an administrator can\n                  register a case variant of an existing control node\u0027s hostname\n                  and obtain a mesh-CA-signed certificate that TLS peers, which\n                  match hostnames case-insensitively, accept as that control node.\n                  In managed/hosted deployments \u2014 where the customer holds\n                  controller superuser but the platform operator runs the mesh \u2014\n                  this yields a long-lived, non-revocable mesh peer credential and,\n                  with an on-path position, TLS impersonation or interception of\n                  control/hybrid mesh nodes. It does not grant direct remote code\n                  execution, because receptor work submission is gated by a\n                  separate signing key not included in the bundle."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-84716",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-24T07:16:34.063",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.6,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.3,
        "impactScore": 4.7,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-09-23T20:17:18.210",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71113"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71114"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71179"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84716"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2527199"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-266"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…