GCVE-1-2026-20112 (CVE-2026-60125)
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-07-08 13:36 – Updated: 2026-07-08 13:36
VLAI
Title
importModule function in MISP ignores per-organisation import module restrictions
Summary
MISP’s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import_<module>_restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.
This could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user’s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user’s organisation.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/0ed79b4d3177f… | patch |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "misp",
"repo": "https://github.com/misp/misp",
"vendor": "misp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.5.42",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Sami Mokaddem"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Berk Polat"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) aka Claudy"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP\u2019s \u003ccode\u003eimportModule()\u003c/code\u003e path used \u003ccode\u003egetEnabledModule()\u003c/code\u003e to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by \u003ccode\u003egetEnabledModules()\u003c/code\u003e. As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via \u003ccode\u003ePlugin.Import_\u0026lt;module\u0026gt;_restrict\u003c/code\u003e could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user\u2019s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user\u2019s organisation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "MISP\u2019s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import_\u003cmodule\u003e_restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.\n\n\nThis could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user\u2019s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user\u2019s organisation."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/0ed79b4d3177f4b9e44040962161a1a436d2587d"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "importModule function in MISP ignores per-organisation import module restrictions",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-60125",
"datePublished": "2026-07-08T13:36:15.651888Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-08T13:36:48.024Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-08T13:36:48.095956Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20112"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…