GHSA-26CJ-H793-XX7V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-23 21:30 – Updated: 2026-09-24 06:31CopyAPIView (awx/awx/api/generics.py:873) sets permission_classes = (IsAuthenticated,), so DRF's get_object() performs no object-level RBAC. The get() handler (lines 988–991) explicitly guards with request.user.can_access(obj.class, 'read', obj) — but post() (lines 1001–1010) does not. POST only checks:
can_access(model, 'add', create_kwargs_check)
can_access(model, 'copy_related', obj)
For JobTemplate, can_add (awx/awx/main/access.py:1465–1520) gates on
inventory.use_role + project.use_role + execution_environment.read_role — resource-level roles that do not imply read on the source JT — and can_copy_related (1522–1534) checks only credentials.use_role. None of these imply the caller can read the source JT.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-76648"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-23T19:19:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "CopyAPIView (awx/awx/api/generics.py:873) sets permission_classes =\n(IsAuthenticated,), so DRF\u0027s get_object() performs no object-level\nRBAC. The get() handler (lines 988\u2013991) explicitly guards with\nrequest.user.can_access(obj._class_, \u0027read\u0027, obj) \u2014 but post()\n(lines 1001\u20131010) does not. POST only checks:\n\ncan_access(model, \u0027add\u0027, create_kwargs_check)\n\ncan_access(model, \u0027copy_related\u0027, obj)\n\nFor JobTemplate, can_add (awx/awx/main/access.py:1465\u20131520) gates on\n\ninventory.use_role + project.use_role +\nexecution_environment.read_role \u2014 resource-level roles that do not\nimply read on the source JT \u2014 and can_copy_related (1522\u20131534) checks\nonly credentials.use_role. None of these imply the caller can read the\nsource JT.",
"id": "GHSA-26cj-h793-xx7v",
"modified": "2026-09-24T06:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-09-23T21:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-76648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2519720"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.