ghsa-2qpc-3frw-rxpf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:21
Modified
2025-04-03 04:20
Details
Race condition in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 7.0(0), 7.0(2), and 7.0(4), when running with an Active/Standby configuration and when the failover LAN interface fails, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (standby firewall failure) by sending spoofed ARP responses from an IP address of an active firewall, which prevents the standby firewall from becoming active, aka "failover denial of service."
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2005-3788", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2005-11-24T11:03:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Race condition in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 7.0(0), 7.0(2), and 7.0(4), when running with an Active/Standby configuration and when the failover LAN interface fails, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (standby firewall failure) by sending spoofed ARP responses from an IP address of an active firewall, which prevents the standby firewall from becoming active, aka \"failover denial of service.\"", id: "GHSA-2qpc-3frw-rxpf", modified: "2025-04-03T04:20:27Z", published: "2022-05-01T02:21:20Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3788", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/23160", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=113199814008230&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=113201784415859&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/17550", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/178", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015205", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15407", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.