ghsa-34pw-489q-jrxj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:06
Modified
2022-05-17 01:06
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlDictComputeFastQKey function in dict.c in libxml2 before 2.9.3 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2015-7497",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2015-12-15T21:59:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlDictComputeFastQKey function in dict.c in libxml2 before 2.9.3 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.",
   id: "GHSA-34pw-489q-jrxj",
   modified: "2022-05-17T01:06:31Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T01:06:31Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7497",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2549",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2550",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1089",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7497",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281862",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml2/commit/?id=6360a31a84efe69d155ed96306b9a931a40beab9",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04944172",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-37",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00120.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-01/msg00031.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145382616617563&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2549.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2550.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1089.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3430",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/79508",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034243",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2834-1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://xmlsoft.org/news.html",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.