ghsa-388x-h72v-g58j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:27
Modified
2022-05-13 01:27
Details
Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-3192" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-10-14T05:58:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.", "id": "GHSA-388x-h72v-g58j", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:27:30Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:27:30Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3192" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.