ghsa-388x-h72v-g58j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:27
Modified
2022-05-13 01:27
Details

Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-3192"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-10-14T05:58:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.",
  "id": "GHSA-388x-h72v-g58j",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:27:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:27:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3192"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.