cve-2010-3192
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2010-10-12 21:00
Modified
2024-09-16 16:17
Severity ?
Summary
Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5Mailing List
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T03:03:18.523Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
          },
          {
            "name": "20100427 Fun with FORTIFY_SOURCE",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100825 CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2010-10-12T21:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
        },
        {
          "name": "20100427 Fun with FORTIFY_SOURCE",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20100825 CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2010-3192",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
            },
            {
              "name": "20100427 Fun with FORTIFY_SOURCE",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100825 CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2010-3192",
    "datePublished": "2010-10-12T21:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2010-08-31T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T16:17:25.715Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.26\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"D4B57CAA-FEDE-48A6-A22F-56CAEA79F200\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Algunos mecanismos run-time de protecci\\u00f3n de memoria en la Librer\\u00eda C de GNU (tambi\\u00e9n conocido como glibc o libc6) print argv[0] y backtrace information, lo cual permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto obtener informaci\\u00f3n sensible de procesos de memoria mediante la ejecuci\\u00f3n de un programa incorrecto, como el demostrado por un programa setuid que contiene un error de desbordamiento de b\\u00fafer basado en pila, relacionado con la funci\\u00f3n __fortify_fail en debug/fortify_fail.c, y las implementaciones __stack_chk_fail (tambi\\u00e9n conocida como stack protection) y __chk_fail (tambi\\u00e9n conocida como FORTIFY_SOURCE).\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2010-3192",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:18:14.657",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2010-10-14T05:58:06.833",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-200\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-3192\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2010-10-14T05:58:06.833\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:18:14.657\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Algunos mecanismos run-time de protecci\u00f3n de memoria en la Librer\u00eda C de GNU (tambi\u00e9n conocido como glibc o libc6) print argv[0] y backtrace information, lo cual permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible de procesos de memoria mediante la ejecuci\u00f3n de un programa incorrecto, como el demostrado por un programa setuid que contiene un error de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila, relacionado con la funci\u00f3n __fortify_fail en debug/fortify_fail.c, y las implementaciones __stack_chk_fail (tambi\u00e9n conocida como stack protection) y __chk_fail (tambi\u00e9n conocida como FORTIFY_SOURCE).\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.26\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D4B57CAA-FEDE-48A6-A22F-56CAEA79F200\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.