gsd-2010-3192
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2010-3192


To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2010-3192",
    "description": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.",
    "id": "GSD-2010-3192",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-3192.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2010-3192"
      ],
      "details": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.",
      "id": "GSD-2010-3192",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:34.620563Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2010-3192",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
          },
          {
            "name": "20100427 Fun with FORTIFY_SOURCE",
            "refsource": "FULLDISC",
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20100825 CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "2.26",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2010-3192"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-200"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100825 CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
            },
            {
              "name": "20100427 Fun with FORTIFY_SOURCE",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2020-03-31T15:32Z",
      "publishedDate": "2010-10-14T05:58Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.