github - ghsa-38cg-gg9j-q9j9

ghsa-38cg-gg9j-q9j9

Vulnerability from github

Published

2019-06-27 17:25

Modified

2021-08-17 15:33

Severity ?

4.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Summary

Improper Certificate Validation and Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Keycloak

Details

A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "6.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-3875"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295",
      "CWE-345"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2019-06-27T15:43:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-06-12T14:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols (\u0027http\u0027 or \u0027ldap\u0027) and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn\u0027t validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.",
  "id": "GHSA-38cg-gg9j-q9j9",
  "modified": "2021-08-17T15:33:33Z",
  "published": "2019-06-27T17:25:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-3875"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Certificate Validation and Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Keycloak"
}

cve-2019-3875

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2019-06-12 13:51

Modified

2024-08-04 19:19

Severity ?

6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Summary

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875	x_refsource_CONFIRM
	http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748	vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID

Impacted products

▼	Vendor	Product
	Red Hat	keycloak

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T19:19:18.609Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875"
          },
          {
            "name": "108748",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "keycloak",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols (\u0027http\u0027 or \u0027ldap\u0027) and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn\u0027t validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-345",
              "description": "CWE-345",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2019-06-13T13:06:06",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875"
        },
        {
          "name": "108748",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-3875",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "keycloak",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "6.0.2"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Red Hat"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols (\u0027http\u0027 or \u0027ldap\u0027) and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn\u0027t validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle."
            }
          ]
        },
        "impact": {
          "cvss": [
            [
              {
                "vectorString": "6.5/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
                "version": "3.0"
              }
            ]
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-345"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-295"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875"
            },
            {
              "name": "108748",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2019-3875",
    "datePublished": "2019-06-12T13:51:38",
    "dateReserved": "2019-01-03T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T19:19:18.609Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted