cve-2019-3875
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-06-12 13:51
Modified
2024-08-04 19:19
Summary
A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Red Hat keycloak Version: 6.0.2
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2024-08-04T19:19:18.609Z",
               orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
               shortName: "CVE",
            },
            references: [
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875",
               },
               {
                  name: "108748",
                  tags: [
                     "vdb-entry",
                     "x_refsource_BID",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748",
               },
            ],
            title: "CVE Program Container",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "keycloak",
               vendor: "Red Hat",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "6.0.2",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.",
            },
         ],
         metrics: [
            {
               cvssV3_0: {
                  attackComplexity: "LOW",
                  attackVector: "NETWORK",
                  availabilityImpact: "NONE",
                  baseScore: 6.5,
                  baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
                  confidentialityImpact: "LOW",
                  integrityImpact: "LOW",
                  privilegesRequired: "NONE",
                  scope: "UNCHANGED",
                  userInteraction: "NONE",
                  vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
                  version: "3.0",
               },
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     cweId: "CWE-345",
                     description: "CWE-345",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "CWE",
                  },
               ],
            },
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     cweId: "CWE-295",
                     description: "CWE-295",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "CWE",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2019-06-13T13:06:06",
            orgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
            shortName: "redhat",
         },
         references: [
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
               ],
               url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875",
            },
            {
               name: "108748",
               tags: [
                  "vdb-entry",
                  "x_refsource_BID",
               ],
               url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748",
            },
         ],
         x_legacyV4Record: {
            CVE_data_meta: {
               ASSIGNER: "secalert@redhat.com",
               ID: "CVE-2019-3875",
               STATE: "PUBLIC",
            },
            affects: {
               vendor: {
                  vendor_data: [
                     {
                        product: {
                           product_data: [
                              {
                                 product_name: "keycloak",
                                 version: {
                                    version_data: [
                                       {
                                          version_value: "6.0.2",
                                       },
                                    ],
                                 },
                              },
                           ],
                        },
                        vendor_name: "Red Hat",
                     },
                  ],
               },
            },
            data_format: "MITRE",
            data_type: "CVE",
            data_version: "4.0",
            description: {
               description_data: [
                  {
                     lang: "eng",
                     value: "A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.",
                  },
               ],
            },
            impact: {
               cvss: [
                  [
                     {
                        vectorString: "6.5/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
                        version: "3.0",
                     },
                  ],
               ],
            },
            problemtype: {
               problemtype_data: [
                  {
                     description: [
                        {
                           lang: "eng",
                           value: "CWE-345",
                        },
                     ],
                  },
                  {
                     description: [
                        {
                           lang: "eng",
                           value: "CWE-295",
                        },
                     ],
                  },
               ],
            },
            references: {
               reference_data: [
                  {
                     name: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875",
                     refsource: "CONFIRM",
                     url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "108748",
                     refsource: "BID",
                     url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748",
                  },
               ],
            },
         },
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
      assignerShortName: "redhat",
      cveId: "CVE-2019-3875",
      datePublished: "2019-06-12T13:51:38",
      dateReserved: "2019-01-03T00:00:00",
      dateUpdated: "2024-08-04T19:19:18.609Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      fkie_nvd: {
         configurations: "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.0.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"D7096C1E-0B43-4458-83D6-1F94061279E5\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E939A0E0-3437-459E-9FAB-FE42811B1D32\"}]}]}]",
         descriptions: "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se encontr\\u00f3 una vulnerabilidad en keycloak versi\\u00f3n anterior a 6.0.2. El autenticador X.509 admite la comprobaci\\u00f3n de certificados de cliente por medio de la CRL, donde la lista CRL se puede obtener de la URL proporcionada en el certificado (CDP) o por medio de la path configurada por separado. Los CRL frecuentemente est\\u00e1n disponibles por medio de la red mediante protocolos no seguros ('http' o 'ldap') y, por lo tanto, la persona que llama debe verificar la firma y posiblemente la path de certificaci\\u00f3n. Keycloak actualmente no comprueba las firmas en CRL, lo que resulta en la posibilidad de varios ataques de tipo hombre en el medio (man-in-the-middle).\"}]",
         id: "CVE-2019-3875",
         lastModified: "2024-11-21T04:42:46.400",
         metrics: "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 2.5}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 2.5}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.8, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 4.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
         published: "2019-06-12T14:29:04.760",
         references: "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
         sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com",
         vulnStatus: "Modified",
         weaknesses: "[{\"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-345\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]",
      },
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-3875\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2019-06-12T14:29:04.760\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T04:42:46.400\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontró una vulnerabilidad en keycloak versión anterior a 6.0.2. El autenticador X.509 admite la comprobación de certificados de cliente por medio de la CRL, donde la lista CRL se puede obtener de la URL proporcionada en el certificado (CDP) o por medio de la path configurada por separado. Los CRL frecuentemente están disponibles por medio de la red mediante protocolos no seguros ('http' o 'ldap') y, por lo tanto, la persona que llama debe verificar la firma y posiblemente la path de certificación. Keycloak actualmente no comprueba las firmas en CRL, lo que resulta en la posibilidad de varios ataques de tipo hombre en el medio (man-in-the-middle).\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.5},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":2.5}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.0.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D7096C1E-0B43-4458-83D6-1F94061279E5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E939A0E0-3437-459E-9FAB-FE42811B1D32\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108748\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3875\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.