GHSA-3J43-9V8V-CP3F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-07 19:00 – Updated: 2025-04-09 19:53Impact
Summary
A vulnerability in Apollo Router's usage of Apollo Compiler allowed queries with deeply nested and reused named fragments to be prohibitively expensive to validate. This could lead to excessive resource consumption and denial of service.
Details
Named fragments were being processed once per fragment spread in some cases during query validation, leading to exponential resource usage when deeply nested and reused fragments were involved.
Fix/Mitigation
Apollo Router's usage of Apollo Compiler has been updated so that validation logic processes each named fragment only once, preventing redundant traversal.
Patches
This has been remediated in apollo-router versions 1.61.2 and 2.1.1.
Workarounds
The only known workaround is "Safelisting with IDs only" per Safelisting with Persisted Queries - Apollo GraphQL Docs. The "Safelisting" security level is not sufficient, since that level allows freeform GraphQL queries to be sent to Apollo Router.
References
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the efforts of the security community in identifying and improving the performance and security of query validation mechanisms.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "apollo-router"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.61.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "apollo-router"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0-alpha.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32380"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-07T19:00:30Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-09T16:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "# Impact\n\n## Summary\n\nA vulnerability in Apollo Router\u0027s usage of Apollo Compiler allowed queries with deeply nested and reused named fragments to be prohibitively expensive to validate. This could lead to excessive resource consumption and denial of service.\n\n## Details\n\nNamed fragments were being processed once per fragment spread in some cases during query validation, leading to exponential resource usage when deeply nested and reused fragments were involved.\n\n## Fix/Mitigation\n\nApollo Router\u0027s usage of Apollo Compiler has been updated so that validation logic processes each named fragment only once, preventing redundant traversal.\n\n# Patches\n\nThis has been remediated in `apollo-router` versions 1.61.2 and 2.1.1.\n\n# Workarounds\nThe only known workaround is \"Safelisting with IDs only\" per [Safelisting with Persisted Queries - Apollo GraphQL Docs](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/graphos/routing/security/persisted-queries#router-security-levels). The \"Safelisting\" security level is not sufficient, since that level allows freeform GraphQL queries to be sent to Apollo Router.\n\n# References \n[Query Planning Documentation](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/graphos/reference/federation/query-plans)\n\n## Acknowledgements\nWe appreciate the efforts of the security community in identifying and improving the performance and security of query validation mechanisms.",
"id": "GHSA-3j43-9v8v-cp3f",
"modified": "2025-04-09T19:53:50Z",
"published": "2025-04-07T19:00:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apollographql/router/security/advisories/GHSA-3j43-9v8v-cp3f"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32380"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apollographql/router/commit/ab6675a63174715ea6ff50881fc957831d4e9564"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apollographql/router/commit/bba032e183b861348a466d3123c7137a1ae18952"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apollographql/router"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apollo Router Query Validation Vulnerable to Excessive Resource Consumption via Named Fragment Processing"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.