GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-4RF6-QX84-Q9FV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:49 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:49
VLAI
Summary
Fulgur: Non-painting replaced elements amplify to thousands of blank PDF pages (denial of service)
Details

fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. In versions prior to 0.26.0, a childless box that resolves to a pathologically tall height was amplified into thousands of blank PDF pages, even when it produces no visible output.

The childless-collapse defense that would normally collapse such a box was gated by a tag-only "replaced content" check, so any non-painting replaced element bypassed it, including:

  • an unresolved src (the common offline-first case),
  • a visibility:hidden image,
  • an undecodable image format, and
  • an empty <svg>.

A trailing-sibling variant of the same gap was also open. A few bytes of HTML therefore amplified into roughly MAX_PAGES (10,000) blank pages; the renderer allocates and runs a per-page loop over them, producing CPU and memory exhaustion. An attacker able to submit HTML to a fulgur-based conversion service can trigger this with a trivially small payload, denying service to the host and any co-tenants.

Patches

Fixed in 0.26.0 (PR #575). The tag-only gate was removed so that any pathologically tall childless box collapses regardless of whether it is a replaced element, closing the missing-src, visibility:hidden, undecodable-format, and empty-<svg> vectors at once, along with the trailing-sibling variant.

Workarounds

Upgrade to 0.26.0 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, validate or constrain untrusted CSS (in particular very large height / vh on elements) before passing HTML to fulgur.

Related

Versions prior to 0.19.0 additionally lacked any page-count cap, allowing an unbounded (rather than 10,000-page) variant of this amplification and a non-terminating loop on non-finite heights. That earlier variant is tracked separately as GHSA-j5cx-ph8g-95v3.

Attack Vector rationale

fulgur performs no network I/O of its own; it renders HTML/CSS handed to it by the embedding application. This advisory scores the crate independent of any specific adopting program, so per the CVSS v3.1 User Guide §3.7 (scoring library vulnerabilities related to incoming data) the Attack Vector is assessed as Network for the reasonable worst-case deployment — a network-facing service that renders untrusted, attacker-supplied HTML without user interaction. A concrete system that receives the HTML in one component and passes it to fulgur in a separate component may assess a lower environmental Attack Vector (Local, per §3.10).

References

  • Fix: https://github.com/fulgur-rs/fulgur/pull/575
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "fulgur"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.26.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68537"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-17T18:49:15Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "`fulgur` converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that\nprocesses input supplied by many tenants. In versions prior to 0.26.0, a\nchildless box that resolves to a pathologically tall height was amplified into\nthousands of blank PDF pages, even when it produces no visible output.\n\nThe childless-collapse defense that would normally collapse such a box was gated\nby a tag-only \"replaced content\" check, so any **non-painting replaced element**\nbypassed it, including:\n\n- an unresolved `src` (the common offline-first case),\n- a `visibility:hidden` image,\n- an undecodable image format, and\n- an empty `\u003csvg\u003e`.\n\nA trailing-sibling variant of the same gap was also open. A few bytes of HTML\ntherefore amplified into roughly `MAX_PAGES` (10,000) blank pages; the renderer\nallocates and runs a per-page loop over them, producing CPU and memory\nexhaustion. An attacker able to submit HTML to a fulgur-based conversion service\ncan trigger this with a trivially small payload, denying service to the host and\nany co-tenants.\n\n## Patches\n\nFixed in **0.26.0** (PR #575). The tag-only gate was removed so that any\npathologically tall childless box collapses regardless of whether it is a\nreplaced element, closing the missing-`src`, `visibility:hidden`,\nundecodable-format, and empty-`\u003csvg\u003e` vectors at once, along with the\ntrailing-sibling variant.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nUpgrade to 0.26.0 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, validate\nor constrain untrusted CSS (in particular very large `height` / `vh` on\nelements) before passing HTML to fulgur.\n\n## Related\n\nVersions prior to 0.19.0 additionally lacked any page-count cap, allowing an\nunbounded (rather than 10,000-page) variant of this amplification and a\nnon-terminating loop on non-finite heights. That earlier variant is tracked\nseparately as GHSA-j5cx-ph8g-95v3.\n\n## Attack Vector rationale\n\n`fulgur` performs no network I/O of its own; it renders HTML/CSS handed to it by\nthe embedding application. This advisory scores the crate independent of any\nspecific adopting program, so per the CVSS v3.1 User Guide \u00a73.7 (scoring library\nvulnerabilities related to incoming data) the Attack Vector is assessed as\n**Network** for the reasonable worst-case deployment \u2014 a network-facing service\nthat renders untrusted, attacker-supplied HTML without user interaction. A\nconcrete system that receives the HTML in one component and passes it to fulgur\nin a separate component may assess a lower environmental Attack Vector (Local,\nper \u00a73.10).\n\n## References\n\n- Fix: https://github.com/fulgur-rs/fulgur/pull/575",
  "id": "GHSA-4rf6-qx84-q9fv",
  "modified": "2026-09-17T18:49:15Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:49:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fulgur-rs/fulgur/security/advisories/GHSA-4rf6-qx84-q9fv"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fulgur-rs/fulgur/pull/575"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/fulgur-rs/fulgur"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0201.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Fulgur: Non-painting replaced elements amplify to thousands of blank PDF pages (denial of service)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…