ghsa-599g-72g6-j2r4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-22 21:30
Modified
2022-12-30 00:30
Severity ?
Details
Mozilla developers Calixte Denizet, Kershaw Chang, Christian Holler, Jason Kratzer, Gabriele Svelto, Tyson Smith, Simon Giesecke, and Steve Fink reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 95 and Firefox ESR 91.4. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 91.5, Firefox < 96, and Thunderbird < 91.5.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-22751" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-22T20:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Mozilla developers Calixte Denizet, Kershaw Chang, Christian Holler, Jason Kratzer, Gabriele Svelto, Tyson Smith, Simon Giesecke, and Steve Fink reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 95 and Firefox ESR 91.4. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR \u003c 91.5, Firefox \u003c 96, and Thunderbird \u003c 91.5.", "id": "GHSA-599g-72g6-j2r4", "modified": "2022-12-30T00:30:42Z", "published": "2022-12-22T21:30:30Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22751" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1664149%2C1737816%2C1739366%2C1740274%2C1740797%2C1741201%2C1741869%2C1743221%2C1743515%2C1745373%2C1746011" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-02" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-03" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.