GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5GF3-C25P-FM95

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sunrpc: wait for in-flight TLS handshake callback when cancel loses race

When wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() in svc_tcp_handshake() returns 0 (timeout) or -ERESTARTSYS (signal) and tls_handshake_cancel() then returns false, handshake_complete() has won the cancellation race: it has set HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED and is about to invoke svc_tcp_handshake_done(), but the callback's side effects on xpt_flags and on svsk->sk_handshake_done have not yet committed.

The current code reads xpt_flags immediately to decide whether the session succeeded. Two races result.

If the callback has executed set_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION) but not yet clear_bit(XPT_HANDSHAKE), svc_tcp_handshake() sees a session, enqueues the transport, and returns. svc_xprt_received() then clears XPT_BUSY, a worker thread picks the transport up, the dispatcher in svc_handle_xprt() observes XPT_HANDSHAKE still set, and xpo_handshake is invoked a second time. That svc_tcp_handshake() calls init_completion(&svsk->sk_handshake_done) while the original callback concurrently calls complete_all() on it, corrupting the embedded swait_queue.

If the callback has set HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED but not yet entered svc_tcp_handshake_done(), svc_tcp_handshake() reads XPT_TLS_SESSION as clear and tears the connection down even though the handshake is about to succeed.

Wait for the callback to commit before inspecting xpt_flags. The completion is guaranteed to fire because handshake_complete() invokes svc_tcp_handshake_done() unconditionally once it has set HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72221"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:40Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsunrpc: wait for in-flight TLS handshake callback when cancel loses race\n\nWhen wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() in\nsvc_tcp_handshake() returns 0 (timeout) or -ERESTARTSYS (signal) and\ntls_handshake_cancel() then returns false, handshake_complete() has\nwon the cancellation race: it has set HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED and\nis about to invoke svc_tcp_handshake_done(), but the callback\u0027s\nside effects on xpt_flags and on svsk-\u003esk_handshake_done have not\nyet committed.\n\nThe current code reads xpt_flags immediately to decide whether the\nsession succeeded. Two races result.\n\nIf the callback has executed set_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION) but not yet\nclear_bit(XPT_HANDSHAKE), svc_tcp_handshake() sees a session,\nenqueues the transport, and returns. svc_xprt_received() then\nclears XPT_BUSY, a worker thread picks the transport up, the\ndispatcher in svc_handle_xprt() observes XPT_HANDSHAKE still set,\nand xpo_handshake is invoked a second time. That svc_tcp_handshake()\ncalls init_completion(\u0026svsk-\u003esk_handshake_done) while the original\ncallback concurrently calls complete_all() on it, corrupting the\nembedded swait_queue.\n\nIf the callback has set HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED but not yet\nentered svc_tcp_handshake_done(), svc_tcp_handshake() reads\nXPT_TLS_SESSION as clear and tears the connection down even though\nthe handshake is about to succeed.\n\nWait for the callback to commit before inspecting xpt_flags. The\ncompletion is guaranteed to fire because handshake_complete()\ninvokes svc_tcp_handshake_done() unconditionally once it has set\nHANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED.",
  "id": "GHSA-5gf3-c25p-fm95",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:17Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72221"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d8ceb39884148dc7a2fdf71e1cac5961ed1d2b9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65b23bec1fca6e9ebdc3e6041ebf8c6ab074141b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4f878e8ecd729ccf2e50993444e217583adeace"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d00e32f84ca1a77cb67a3fbf59f58dada95f5a21"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0f4691d42a54d359d8b64509fd9ab938d4f2a33"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…