GHSA-63XM-2248-QGHG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-17 00:01 – Updated: 2022-06-28 00:00
VLAI?
Details

A maliciously crafted TIF file in Autodesk 3ds Max 2022 and 2021 can be used to write beyond the allocated buffer while parsing TIF files. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to arbitrary code execution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-27532"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-16T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A maliciously crafted TIF file in Autodesk 3ds Max 2022 and 2021 can be used to write beyond the allocated buffer while parsing TIF files. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to arbitrary code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-63xm-2248-qghg",
  "modified": "2022-06-28T00:00:48Z",
  "published": "2022-06-17T00:01:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27532"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.autodesk.com/trust/security-advisories/adsk-sa-2022-0010"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…