GHSA-69GG-PVP7-2FX5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 09:30 – Updated: 2026-07-01 09:30
VLAI
Details

The Qi Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the 'page_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to modify the stored Qi Blocks styles of arbitrary posts, templates, or widgets they do not own — including site-wide surfaces via the reserved 'template' and 'widget' page_id values — enabling unauthorized frontend defacement, content hiding, and degradation of any page on the site. The endpoint's permission_callback checks only the generic edit_posts and publish_posts capabilities, meaning any user with the built-in Author role satisfies the check regardless of post ownership.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-10096"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-639"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-01T08:16:19Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Qi Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the \u0027page_id\u0027 parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to modify the stored Qi Blocks styles of arbitrary posts, templates, or widgets they do not own \u2014 including site-wide surfaces via the reserved \u0027template\u0027 and \u0027widget\u0027 page_id values \u2014 enabling unauthorized frontend defacement, content hiding, and degradation of any page on the site. The endpoint\u0027s permission_callback checks only the generic edit_posts and publish_posts capabilities, meaning any user with the built-in Author role satisfies the check regardless of post ownership.",
  "id": "GHSA-69gg-pvp7-2fx5",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T09:30:25Z",
  "published": "2026-07-01T09:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-10096"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/qi-blocks/tags/1.4.9/inc/admin/global-styles/class-qi-blocks-framework-global-styles.php#L134"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/qi-blocks/tags/1.4.9/inc/admin/global-styles/class-qi-blocks-framework-global-styles.php#L142"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/qi-blocks/tags/1.4.9/inc/admin/global-styles/class-qi-blocks-framework-global-styles.php#L82"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3572812%40qi-blocks\u0026new=3572812%40qi-blocks\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/64251fd4-1627-49d0-831f-5cb9898c38bf?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…