GHSA-6CP8-V795-JR2J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 21:53 – Updated: 2026-06-26 21:53
VLAI
Summary
Hackney has an infinite loop on non-token byte at start of an Alt-Svc entry
Details

Summary

CVE-2026-47066 is an infinite loop (CWE-835) in hackney's Alt-Svc response header parser (src/hackney_altsvc.erl). When an HTTP server returns an Alt-Svc header whose value begins with a non-token byte (e.g. !, @, =, ;), the parser enters a tight tail-recursive loop that pins an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU and permanently hangs the calling connection process. Because the parser is invoked synchronously on every HTTP response, any attacker-controlled origin can trigger the hang with a single-byte header value.

Details

1. Parser dispatch

parse_and_cache/3 is called inside the hackney connection process on each HTTP response. It collects all Alt-Svc header values via collect_altsvc_headers/1, concatenates them, and passes the result to parse/1, which calls parse_entries(Header, []).

2. Failed token consumption

parse_entries/2 → parse_entry/1 → parse_protocol/1 → parse_token(Data, <<>>). The function parse_token/2 pattern-matches leading bytes: alphanumeric, -, _, whitespace, and comma all have explicit clauses. Any other byte (e.g. !) falls through to the catch-all:

parse_token(Rest, <<>>) -> {undefined, Rest}.

This returns the input unchanged — no byte is consumed.

3. No-progress loop

parse_entry propagates {undefined, Rest} back to parse_entries/2, which calls skip_comma(Rest). Because the first byte is not ,, skip_comma also returns Rest unchanged. parse_entries then recurses with the identical buffer:

parse_entries(Data, Acc)  % Data identical to previous iteration

Erlang tail recursion never preempts on a pure CPU loop, so the scheduler is pinned and the process never yields or returns.

4. Root cause

parse_entries/2 has no guard that detects zero-byte progress after a failed parse_entry call and no fallback to advance past the offending byte.

PoC

  1. Start an HTTP server that responds with the header Alt-Svc: ! (any single non-token byte suffices).
  2. Issue any HTTP GET request via hackney to that server: erlang hackney:request(get, "http://attacker.example/", [], <<>>, [])
  3. Observe that the call never returns; the Erlang scheduler hosting the connection process is pinned at 100% CPU indefinitely.

Alternatively, call the parser directly: hackney_altsvc:parse(<<"!">>) — the process hangs immediately.

Impact

Denial of service via unbounded CPU consumption. Any application using hackney 2.0.0-beta.1 through 4.0.0 that connects to attacker-controlled HTTP endpoints is affected. No authentication is required; a single response header byte is sufficient to hang the connection process. Fixed in hackney 4.0.1. CVSS v4.0 score: 8.7 (HIGH).

Resources

  • Introduction commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/408e5fe20302226ea8c74dde2bcbd452d712b5b2
  • Patch commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/e548aba1f97ffa3f4750da7b772998fb78c01894
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "hackney"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47066"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-835"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-26T21:53:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-25T15:16:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n[CVE-2026-47066](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47066) is an infinite loop (CWE-835) in hackney\u0027s Alt-Svc response header parser (`src/hackney_altsvc.erl`). When an HTTP server returns an `Alt-Svc` header whose value begins with a non-token byte (e.g. `!`, `@`, `=`, `;`), the parser enters a tight tail-recursive loop that pins an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU and permanently hangs the calling connection process. Because the parser is invoked synchronously on every HTTP response, any attacker-controlled origin can trigger the hang with a single-byte header value.\n\n### Details\n\n**1. Parser dispatch**\n\n`parse_and_cache/3` is called inside the hackney connection process on each HTTP response. It collects all `Alt-Svc` header values via `collect_altsvc_headers/1`, concatenates them, and passes the result to `parse/1`, which calls `parse_entries(Header, [])`.\n\n**2. Failed token consumption**\n\n`parse_entries/2` \u2192 `parse_entry/1` \u2192 `parse_protocol/1` \u2192 `parse_token(Data, \u003c\u003c\u003e\u003e)`. The function `parse_token/2` pattern-matches leading bytes: alphanumeric, `-`, `_`, whitespace, and comma all have explicit clauses. Any other byte (e.g. `!`) falls through to the catch-all:\n\n```erlang\nparse_token(Rest, \u003c\u003c\u003e\u003e) -\u003e {undefined, Rest}.\n```\n\nThis returns the *input unchanged* \u2014 no byte is consumed.\n\n**3. No-progress loop**\n\n`parse_entry` propagates `{undefined, Rest}` back to `parse_entries/2`, which calls `skip_comma(Rest)`. Because the first byte is not `,`, `skip_comma` also returns `Rest` unchanged. `parse_entries` then recurses with the identical buffer:\n\n```erlang\nparse_entries(Data, Acc)  % Data identical to previous iteration\n```\n\nErlang tail recursion never preempts on a pure CPU loop, so the scheduler is pinned and the process never yields or returns.\n\n**4. Root cause**\n\n`parse_entries/2` has no guard that detects zero-byte progress after a failed `parse_entry` call and no fallback to advance past the offending byte.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Start an HTTP server that responds with the header `Alt-Svc: !` (any single non-token byte suffices).\n2. Issue any HTTP GET request via hackney to that server:\n   ```erlang\n   hackney:request(get, \"http://attacker.example/\", [], \u003c\u003c\u003e\u003e, [])\n   ```\n3. Observe that the call never returns; the Erlang scheduler hosting the connection process is pinned at 100% CPU indefinitely.\n\nAlternatively, call the parser directly: `hackney_altsvc:parse(\u003c\u003c\"!\"\u003e\u003e)` \u2014 the process hangs immediately.\n\n### Impact\n\nDenial of service via unbounded CPU consumption. Any application using hackney 2.0.0-beta.1 through 4.0.0 that connects to attacker-controlled HTTP endpoints is affected. No authentication is required; a single response header byte is sufficient to hang the connection process. Fixed in hackney 4.0.1. CVSS v4.0 score: **8.7 (HIGH)**.\n\n## Resources\n\n* Introduction commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/408e5fe20302226ea8c74dde2bcbd452d712b5b2\n* Patch commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/e548aba1f97ffa3f4750da7b772998fb78c01894",
  "id": "GHSA-6cp8-v795-jr2j",
  "modified": "2026-06-26T21:53:07Z",
  "published": "2026-06-26T21:53:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-6cp8-v795-jr2j"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47066"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/e548aba1f97ffa3f4750da7b772998fb78c01894"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-47066.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/benoitc/hackney"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-47066"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Hackney has an infinite loop on non-token byte at start of an Alt-Svc entry"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…