ghsa-6g46-c364-qcjc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:21
Modified
2022-05-02 03:21
Details
Integer signedness error in Java SE Development Kit (JDK) and Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 5.0 Update 17 and earlier, and 6 Update 12 and earlier, allows remote attackers to access files or execute arbitrary code via crafted glyph descriptions in a Type1 font, which bypasses a signed comparison and triggers a buffer overflow.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2009-1099", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2009-03-25T23:30:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Integer signedness error in Java SE Development Kit (JDK) and Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 5.0 Update 17 and earlier, and 6 Update 12 and earlier, allows remote attackers to access files or execute arbitrary code via crafted glyph descriptions in a Type1 font, which bypasses a signed comparison and triggers a buffer overflow.", id: "GHSA-6g46-c364-qcjc", modified: "2022-05-02T03:21:37Z", published: "2022-05-02T03:21:37Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1099", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5726", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1198.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&objectID=c01745133", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=777", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00001.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00003.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00003.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00001.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=124344236532162&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/34495", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/34496", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/35156", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/35223", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/35255", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/35416", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/35776", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/36185", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/37386", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/37460", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200911-02.xml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-118669-19-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-254571-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2009-108.htm", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2009-109.htm", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2009-091332.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0392.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0394.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1038.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507985/100/0/threaded", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34240", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021913", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2009-0016.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1426", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3316", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.