ghsa-6g72-x2jp-6592
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:11
Modified
2022-05-14 03:11
Severity ?
Details
HTML tags received from the Pocket server will be processed without sanitization and any JavaScript code executed will be run in the "about:pocket-saved" (unprivileged) page, giving it access to Pocket's messaging API through HTML injection. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 45.6 and Firefox < 50.1.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-9901" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-06-11T21:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "HTML tags received from the Pocket server will be processed without sanitization and any JavaScript code executed will be run in the \"about:pocket-saved\" (unprivileged) page, giving it access to Pocket\u0027s messaging API through HTML injection. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR \u003c 45.6 and Firefox \u003c 50.1.", "id": "GHSA-6g72-x2jp-6592", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:11:23Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:11:23Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9901" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1320057" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-15" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-94" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-95" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2946.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2973.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94885" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037461" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.