GHSA-6QHC-X826-342C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 21:02 – Updated: 2026-06-16 21:02
VLAI
Summary
Crawl4AI: SSRF via proxy settings in the Docker server bypasses the crawl-URL SSRF check
Details

Summary

The Docker API server applied its SSRF destination check to the crawl target URL only, not to the proxy address. An unauthenticated request could supply a proxy pointing at an internal IP and route the browser through it, reaching internal services and cloud-metadata endpoints, while using a perfectly valid crawl URL. The Docker API is unauthenticated by default.

Affected paths

/crawl, /crawl/stream, and /crawl/job accept a browser_config (and crawler_config). The following all feed Chromium's egress and were unchecked: - browser_config.proxy_config.server - browser_config.proxy (deprecated field) - crawler_config.proxy_config.server - --proxy-server / --proxy-pac-url / --proxy-bypass-list / --host-resolver-rules flags in browser_config.extra_args

Attack

An attacker sends /crawl with a benign, validation-passing URL but a proxy_config.server pointing at an internal IP. Chromium routes all requests through that proxy. For plain-HTTP targets the proxy receives the full request and can return any content, which is then returned verbatim in the crawl result (results[0].html / cleaned_html / markdown). In a real deployment the proxy would be an attacker-controlled server pointing at cloud metadata (e.g. AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254) to retrieve IAM credential tokens.

Impact

Unauthenticated server-side request forgery to internal services and cloud-metadata endpoints, with the response returned to the attacker.

Fix

Every proxy destination is validated with the same global-routability check used for crawl URLs (reject any resolved address that is not is_global, including IPv6 transition forms) before the browser is constructed; proxy/DNS-redirecting flags are stripped from extra_args. A legitimate public proxy still works. Honors CRAWL4AI_ALLOW_INTERNAL_URLS.

Workarounds

  • Upgrade to the patched version (0.8.9).
  • Enable authentication (CRAWL4AI_API_TOKEN).
  • Restrict the container's outbound network access (egress firewall / no metadata route).

Credits

Geo (geo-chen) - reported the proxy_config.server SSRF with a clear PoC.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.8.8"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "crawl4ai"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.8.9"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53755"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-16T21:02:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe Docker API server applied its SSRF destination check to the crawl target URL only, not to the proxy address. An unauthenticated request could supply a proxy pointing at an internal IP and route the browser through it, reaching internal services and cloud-metadata endpoints, while using a perfectly valid crawl URL. The Docker API is unauthenticated by default.\n\n### Affected paths\n\n`/crawl`, `/crawl/stream`, and `/crawl/job` accept a `browser_config` (and `crawler_config`). The following all feed Chromium\u0027s egress and were unchecked:\n- `browser_config.proxy_config.server`\n- `browser_config.proxy` (deprecated field)\n- `crawler_config.proxy_config.server`\n- `--proxy-server` / `--proxy-pac-url` / `--proxy-bypass-list` / `--host-resolver-rules` flags in `browser_config.extra_args`\n\n### Attack\n\nAn attacker sends `/crawl` with a benign, validation-passing URL but a `proxy_config.server` pointing at an internal IP. Chromium routes all requests through that proxy. For plain-HTTP targets the proxy receives the full request and can return any content, which is then returned verbatim in the crawl result (`results[0].html` / `cleaned_html` / `markdown`). In a real deployment the proxy would be an attacker-controlled server pointing at cloud metadata (e.g. AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254) to retrieve IAM credential tokens.\n\n### Impact\n\nUnauthenticated server-side request forgery to internal services and cloud-metadata endpoints, with the response returned to the attacker.\n\n### Fix\n\nEvery proxy destination is validated with the same global-routability check used for crawl URLs (reject any resolved address that is not `is_global`, including IPv6 transition forms) before the browser is constructed; proxy/DNS-redirecting flags are stripped from `extra_args`. A legitimate public proxy still works. Honors `CRAWL4AI_ALLOW_INTERNAL_URLS`.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Upgrade to the patched version (0.8.9).\n- Enable authentication (`CRAWL4AI_API_TOKEN`).\n- Restrict the container\u0027s outbound network access (egress firewall / no metadata route).\n\n### Credits\n\nGeo ([geo-chen](https://github.com/geo-chen)) - reported the proxy_config.server SSRF with a clear PoC.",
  "id": "GHSA-6qhc-x826-342c",
  "modified": "2026-06-16T21:02:55Z",
  "published": "2026-06-16T21:02:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/unclecode/crawl4ai/security/advisories/GHSA-6qhc-x826-342c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/unclecode/crawl4ai"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Crawl4AI: SSRF via proxy settings in the Docker server bypasses the crawl-URL SSRF check"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…