ghsa-7mhx-7529-p5jc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:33
Modified
2024-07-24 18:31
Severity ?
Details
GDI+ in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2 and Server 2008 SP2; Office 2003 SP3, 2007 SP3, and 2010 SP1 and SP2; Office Compatibility Pack SP3; and Lync 2010, 2010 Attendee, 2013, and Basic 2013 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image, as demonstrated by an image in a Word document, and exploited in the wild in October and November 2013.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-3906" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-11-06T15:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "GDI+ in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2 and Server 2008 SP2; Office 2003 SP3, 2007 SP3, and 2010 SP1 and SP2; Office Compatibility Pack SP3; and Lync 2010, 2010 Attendee, 2013, and Basic 2013 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image, as demonstrated by an image in a Word document, and exploited in the wild in October and November 2013.", "id": "GHSA-7mhx-7529-p5jc", "modified": "2024-07-24T18:31:10Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:33:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3906" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-096" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/mcafee-labs-detects-zero-day-exploit-targeting-microsoft-office-2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2013/11/05/cve-2013-3906-a-graphics-vulnerability-exploited-through-word-documents.aspx" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://technet.microsoft.com/security/advisory/2896666" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30011" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.