ghsa-7r6v-mxc2-pg49
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:14
Modified
2025-01-28 21:30
Severity ?
Details

The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in T3 protocol traffic to TCP port 7001, related to oracle_common/modules/com.bea.core.apache.commons.collections.jar. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is limited to the WebLogic Server product.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2015-4852",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-502",
         "CWE-77",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2015-11-18T15:59:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in T3 protocol traffic to TCP port 7001, related to oracle_common/modules/com.bea.core.apache.commons.collections.jar. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is limited to the WebLogic Server product.",
   id: "GHSA-7r6v-mxc2-pg49",
   modified: "2025-01-28T21:30:58Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T01:14:49Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4852",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://blogs.oracle.com/security/entry/security_alert_cve_2015_4852",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/foxglovesec/JavaUnserializeExploits/blob/master/weblogic.py",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42806",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46628",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://foxglovesecurity.com/2015/11/06/what-do-weblogic-websphere-jboss-jenkins-opennms-and-your-application-have-in-common-this-vulnerability",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152268/Oracle-Weblogic-Server-Deserialization-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/17/19",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2017-3236618.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alert-cve-2015-4852-2763333.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77539",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038292",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.