GHSA-7RMP-3G9F-CVQ8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-04 14:06 – Updated: 2025-04-04 14:06
VLAI?
Summary
generator-jhipster-entity-audit vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection when having Javers selected as Entity Audit Framework
Details

Summary

CWE-470 (Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') when having Javers selected as Entity Audit Framework

Details

In the following two occurences, user input directly leads to class loading without checking against e.g. a whitelist of allowed classes. This is also known as CWE-470 https://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit/blob/e21e83135d10c77d92203c89cb0b0063914e8fe0/generators/spring-boot-javers/templates/src/main/java/package/web/rest/JaversEntityAuditResource.java.ejs#L88 https://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit/blob/e21e83135d10c77d92203c89cb0b0063914e8fe0/generators/spring-boot-javers/templates/src/main/java/package/web/rest/JaversEntityAuditResource.java.ejs#L124

So, if an attacker manages to place some malicious classes into the classpath and also has access to these REST interface for calling the mentioned REST endpoints, using these lines of code can lead to unintended remote code execution.

PoC

  1. Place an arbitrary class with the right package name (starting with JHIpster applications path name) and make it available in class path
  2. Gain access to view entity's audit changelogs (Role: ADMIN)
  3. pass in the malicious class name part as entityType (first mentioned part) // qualifiedName (second mentioned occurence)
  4. class gets loaded and static code blocks in there get executed

--> Should be limited to the already existing whitelist of classes (see first method in that mentioned class)

Impact

Remote Code execution. You need to have some access to place malicious classes into the class path and you need to have a user with ADMIN role on the system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "generator-jhipster-entity-audit"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.9.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-31119"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-470"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-04T14:06:35Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-03T20:15:25Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nCWE-470 (Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code (\u0027Unsafe Reflection\u0027) when having Javers selected as Entity Audit Framework\n\n### Details\nIn the following two occurences, user input directly leads to class loading without checking against e.g. a whitelist of allowed classes. This is also known as CWE-470\nhttps://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit/blob/e21e83135d10c77d92203c89cb0b0063914e8fe0/generators/spring-boot-javers/templates/src/main/java/_package_/web/rest/JaversEntityAuditResource.java.ejs#L88\nhttps://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit/blob/e21e83135d10c77d92203c89cb0b0063914e8fe0/generators/spring-boot-javers/templates/src/main/java/_package_/web/rest/JaversEntityAuditResource.java.ejs#L124\n\nSo, if an attacker manages to place some malicious classes into the classpath and also has access to these REST interface for calling the mentioned REST endpoints, using these lines of code can lead to unintended remote code execution.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Place an arbitrary class with the right package name (starting with JHIpster applications path name) and make it available in class path\n2. Gain access to view entity\u0027s audit changelogs (Role: ADMIN)\n3. pass in the malicious class name part as `entityType` (first mentioned part) // `qualifiedName` (second mentioned occurence)\n4. class gets loaded and static code blocks in there get executed\n\n--\u003e Should be limited to the already existing whitelist of classes (see first method in that mentioned class)\n\n### Impact\nRemote Code execution. You need to have some access to place malicious classes into the class path and you need to have a user with ADMIN role on the system.",
  "id": "GHSA-7rmp-3g9f-cvq8",
  "modified": "2025-04-04T14:06:35Z",
  "published": "2025-04-04T14:06:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit/security/advisories/GHSA-7rmp-3g9f-cvq8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31119"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster-entity-audit/blob/e21e83135d10c77d92203c89cb0b0063914e8fe0/generators/spring-boot-javers/templates/src/main/java/_package_/web/rest/JaversEntityAuditResource.java.ejs#L88"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "generator-jhipster-entity-audit vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection when having Javers selected as Entity Audit Framework"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…