GHSA-7W72-74P3-5CFQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-05 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-05 21:30
VLAI
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

in Apache HTTP Server on Windows

with AllowEncodedSlashes On and MergeSlashes Off  allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via SSRF and malicious requests or content

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.66, which fixes the issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-59775"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-05T11:15:52Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability \n\n\u00a0in Apache HTTP Server on Windows \n\nwith AllowEncodedSlashes On\u00a0and MergeSlashes Off\u00a0 allows to potentially leak NTLM \nhashes to a malicious server via SSRF and malicious requests or content\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.66, which fixes the issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-7w72-74p3-5cfq",
  "modified": "2025-12-05T21:30:23Z",
  "published": "2025-12-05T12:30:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59775"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/12/04/6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…