ghsa-8353-fgcr-xfhx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:14
Modified
2022-07-08 18:59
Summary
Improper Input Validation in Bouncy Castle
Details

The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "1.48",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2013-1624",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2022-07-08T18:59:52Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2013-02-08T19:55:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.",
   id: "GHSA-8353-fgcr-xfhx",
   modified: "2022-07-08T18:59:52Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T02:14:04Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1624",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0371.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0372.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/57716",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/57719",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
   summary: "Improper Input Validation in Bouncy Castle",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.