GHSA-83VM-P52W-F9PW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 21:45 – Updated: 2026-06-08 19:52
VLAI
Summary
vLLM: extract_hidden_states speculative decoding crashes server on any request with penalty parameters
Details

Summary

The extract_hidden_states speculative decoding proposer in vLLM returns a tensor with an incorrect shape after the first decode step, causing a RuntimeError that crashes the EngineCore process. The crash is triggered when any request in the batch uses sampling penalty parameters (repetition_penalty, frequency_penalty, or presence_penalty).

A single request with a penalty parameter (e.g., "repetition_penalty": 1.1) is sufficient to crash the server. The crash is deterministic and immediate — no concurrency, race condition, or special workload is required.

Details

In vLLM v0.17.0, the extract_hidden_states proposer's propose() method returned sampled_token_ids.unsqueeze(-1), producing a tensor of shape (batch_size, 1).

In PR #37013 (first released in v0.18.0), the KV connector interface was refactored out of propose(). The return type changed from tuple[Tensor, KVConnectorOutput | None] to Tensor, and the .unsqueeze(-1) call was removed along with the KV connector output:

# Before (v0.17.0):
return sampled_token_ids.unsqueeze(-1), kv_connector_output  # shape (batch_size, 1)

# After (v0.18.0+):
return sampled_token_ids  # shape (batch_size, 2) after first decode step

The refactor missed that sampled_token_ids changed semantics between the first and subsequent decode steps. After the first decode step, the rejection sampler allocates its output as (batch_size, max_spec_len + 1). With num_speculative_tokens=1, this produces shape (batch_size, 2) instead of the expected (batch_size, 1), causing a broadcast shape mismatch during penalty application.

Impact

Any vLLM deployment between v0.18.0 and v0.19.1 (inclusive) configured with extract_hidden_states speculative decoding is affected. A single API request containing any penalty parameter immediately and permanently crashes the EngineCore process, resulting in complete loss of service availability.

Patches

Fixed in PR #38610, first included in vLLM v0.20.0. The fix slices the return value to sampled_token_ids[:, :1], ensuring the correct (batch_size, 1) shape regardless of the rejection sampler's output dimensions.

Workarounds

  • Upgrade to vLLM v0.20.0 or later.
  • If upgrading is not possible, avoid using extract_hidden_states as the speculative decoding method on affected versions.
  • Alternatively, reject or strip penalty parameters (repetition_penalty, frequency_penalty, presence_penalty) from incoming requests at an API gateway before they reach vLLM.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "vllm"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.18.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.20.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44223"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-131",
      "CWE-704"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-06T21:45:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T20:16:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe `extract_hidden_states` speculative decoding proposer in vLLM returns a tensor with an incorrect shape after the first decode step, causing a `RuntimeError` that crashes the EngineCore process. The crash is triggered when any request in the batch uses sampling penalty parameters (`repetition_penalty`, `frequency_penalty`, or `presence_penalty`).\n\nA single request with a penalty parameter (e.g., `\"repetition_penalty\": 1.1`) is sufficient to crash the server. The crash is deterministic and immediate \u2014 no concurrency, race condition, or special workload is required.\n\n### Details\n\nIn vLLM v0.17.0, the `extract_hidden_states` proposer\u0027s `propose()` method returned `sampled_token_ids.unsqueeze(-1)`, producing a tensor of shape `(batch_size, 1)`.\n\nIn [PR #37013](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/37013) (first released in v0.18.0), the KV connector interface was refactored out of `propose()`. The return type changed from `tuple[Tensor, KVConnectorOutput | None]` to `Tensor`, and the `.unsqueeze(-1)` call was removed along with the KV connector output:\n\n```python\n# Before (v0.17.0):\nreturn sampled_token_ids.unsqueeze(-1), kv_connector_output  # shape (batch_size, 1)\n\n# After (v0.18.0+):\nreturn sampled_token_ids  # shape (batch_size, 2) after first decode step\n```\n\nThe refactor missed that `sampled_token_ids` changed semantics between the first and subsequent decode steps. After the first decode step, the rejection sampler allocates its output as `(batch_size, max_spec_len + 1)`. With `num_speculative_tokens=1`, this produces shape `(batch_size, 2)` instead of the expected `(batch_size, 1)`, causing a broadcast shape mismatch during penalty application.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny vLLM deployment between v0.18.0 and v0.19.1 (inclusive) configured with `extract_hidden_states` speculative decoding is affected. A single API request containing any penalty parameter immediately and permanently crashes the EngineCore process, resulting in complete loss of service availability.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in [PR #38610](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/38610), first included in vLLM v0.20.0. The fix slices the return value to `sampled_token_ids[:, :1]`, ensuring the correct `(batch_size, 1)` shape regardless of the rejection sampler\u0027s output dimensions.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Upgrade to vLLM v0.20.0 or later.\n- If upgrading is not possible, avoid using `extract_hidden_states` as the speculative decoding method on affected versions.\n- Alternatively, reject or strip penalty parameters (`repetition_penalty`, `frequency_penalty`, `presence_penalty`) from incoming requests at an API gateway before they reach vLLM.",
  "id": "GHSA-83vm-p52w-f9pw",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T19:52:35Z",
  "published": "2026-05-06T21:45:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-83vm-p52w-f9pw"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44223"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/38610"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vllm/PYSEC-2026-145.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "vLLM: extract_hidden_states speculative decoding crashes server on any request with penalty parameters"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…