GHSA-86VW-MFPG-WWV9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-02 20:13 – Updated: 2026-07-02 20:13
VLAI
Summary
jsonata: Malicious inputs to "$toMillis" function can cause resource exhaustion
Details

Impact

In JSONata <v2.2.0, it is possible to craft non-matching inputs to the $toMillis function that cause superlinear backtracking in the ISO-8601 validation regex. This may lead to denial of service in applications that evaluate user-provided JSONata expressions.

Patches

This issue has been addressed in JSONata version >= 2.2.0 via fixes that include https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/pull/782 and https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/pull/793. Applications that evaluate user-provided expressions should update ASAP to prevent exploitation.

References

https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/releases/tag/v2.2.0

Credit

Thank you to Doruk Tan Öztürk for disclosing this issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "jsonata"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-52746"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1333"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-02T20:13:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nIn JSONata `\u003cv2.2.0`, it is possible to craft non-matching inputs to the [$toMillis](https://docs.jsonata.org/date-time-functions#tomillis) function that cause superlinear backtracking in the ISO-8601 validation regex. This may lead to denial of service in applications that evaluate user-provided JSONata expressions.\n\n### Patches\nThis issue has been addressed in JSONata version \u003e= 2.2.0 via fixes that include https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/pull/782 and https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/pull/793. Applications that evaluate user-provided expressions should update ASAP to prevent exploitation.\n\n### References\nhttps://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/releases/tag/v2.2.0\n\n### Credit\nThank you to Doruk Tan \u00d6zt\u00fcrk for disclosing this issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-86vw-mfpg-wwv9",
  "modified": "2026-07-02T20:13:55Z",
  "published": "2026-07-02T20:13:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/security/advisories/GHSA-86vw-mfpg-wwv9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/pull/782"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/pull/793"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/commit/80ba95d170f74e3f20f4f36b8b77d8c85cea7686"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/commit/d6ffc17cb16a8e53c222205bd274624e919cce0b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jsonata-js/jsonata/releases/tag/v2.2.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "jsonata: Malicious inputs to \"$toMillis\" function can cause resource exhaustion"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…