GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-8M7C-HF24-5G47

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 16:20 – Updated: 2026-07-20 21:18
VLAI
Summary
NocoDB: OAuth Authorization Code Race Condition
Details

Summary

Two concurrent token-exchange requests using the same OAuth authorization code could each mint a distinct valid (access_token, refresh_token) pair, breaking the single-use guarantee that PKCE relies on.

Details

The token-exchange flow read is_used and called markAsUsed as an unconditional update at the end of the path. A new OAuthAuthorizationCode.claimByCode method now performs an atomic compare-and-swap (WHERE code = ? AND is_used = false) and is called immediately before OAuthToken.insert, after redirect-URI, PKCE, and client authentication have all succeeded. Only the first concurrent caller's UPDATE wins; the rest see invalid_grant: Authorization code has already been used.

Impact

An attacker who has observed an authorization code and the corresponding PKCE verifier (for example through a malicious OAuth-aware client or by racing a real exchange) could obtain a long-lived refresh token in addition to the legitimate one.

Credit

This issue was reported by @eddieran.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.05.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nocodb"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.05.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47386"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-05T16:20:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-23T21:17:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nTwo concurrent token-exchange requests using the same OAuth authorization code could\neach mint a distinct valid `(access_token, refresh_token)` pair, breaking the\nsingle-use guarantee that PKCE relies on.\n\n### Details\nThe token-exchange flow read `is_used` and called `markAsUsed` as an unconditional\nupdate at the end of the path. A new `OAuthAuthorizationCode.claimByCode` method now\nperforms an atomic compare-and-swap (`WHERE code = ? AND is_used = false`) and is\ncalled immediately before `OAuthToken.insert`, after redirect-URI, PKCE, and client\nauthentication have all succeeded. Only the first concurrent caller\u0027s `UPDATE` wins;\nthe rest see `invalid_grant: Authorization code has already been used`.\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker who has observed an authorization code and the corresponding PKCE\nverifier (for example through a malicious OAuth-aware client or by racing a real\nexchange) could obtain a long-lived refresh token in addition to the legitimate one.\n\n### Credit\nThis issue was reported by [@eddieran](https://github.com/eddieran).",
  "id": "GHSA-8m7c-hf24-5g47",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T21:18:55Z",
  "published": "2026-06-05T16:20:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-8m7c-hf24-5g47"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47386"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/releases/tag/2026.05.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "NocoDB: OAuth Authorization Code Race Condition"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…