GHSA-94P4-4M9Q-5M8X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-27 03:34 – Updated: 2025-02-27 18:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/xe/tracing: Fix a potential TP_printk UAF
The commit afd2627f727b ("tracing: Check "%s" dereference via the field and not the TP_printk format") exposes potential UAFs in the xe_bo_move trace event.
Fix those by avoiding dereferencing the xe_mem_type_to_name[] array at TP_printk time.
Since some code refactoring has taken place, explicit backporting may be needed for kernels older than 6.10.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-49570"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T03:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/xe/tracing: Fix a potential TP_printk UAF\n\nThe commit\nafd2627f727b (\"tracing: Check \"%s\" dereference via the field and not the TP_printk format\")\nexposes potential UAFs in the xe_bo_move trace event.\n\nFix those by avoiding dereferencing the\nxe_mem_type_to_name[] array at TP_printk time.\n\nSince some code refactoring has taken place, explicit backporting may\nbe needed for kernels older than 6.10.",
"id": "GHSA-94p4-4m9q-5m8x",
"modified": "2025-02-27T18:31:10Z",
"published": "2025-02-27T03:34:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49570"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07089083a526ea19daa72a1edf9d6e209615b77c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62cd174616ae3bf8a6cf468718f1ae74e5a07727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9402da34611e1039ecccba3c1481c4866f7ca64"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…