ghsa-9wpj-h5jq-88p9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-02-19 00:01
Modified
2022-03-17 00:05
Severity ?
Details

It was discovered, that redis, a persistent key-value database, due to a packaging issue, is prone to a (Debian-specific) Lua sandbox escape, which could result in remote code execution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-0543"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-18T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "It was discovered, that redis, a persistent key-value database, due to a packaging issue, is prone to a (Debian-specific) Lua sandbox escape, which could result in remote code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-9wpj-h5jq-88p9",
  "modified": "2022-03-17T00:05:29Z",
  "published": "2022-02-19T00:01:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0543"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/1005787"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2022/msg00048.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220331-0004"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5081"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ubercomp.com/posts/2022-01-20_redis_on_debian_rce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166885/Redis-Lua-Sandbox-Escape.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.