GHSA-9X9G-5R48-3WVG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-17 21:31The deleteContainer opcode (0x14/20) is processed without verifying the caller's ACL permissions, allowing any authenticated client to delete specific znodes in the data tree regardless of the ACL restrictions on the znode or its parent. This opcode is considered internal-only and the official client doesn't have API for it, but a client that can open a plain TCP session on the ZooKeeper client port (2181 by default) - with NO authentication and NO ACL permissions - can delete any empty persistent znode (including regular persistent nodes, container nodes, and TTL nodes) by issuing the raw protocol OpCode deleteContainer (20). The deleteContainer request path completely skips both the session check and the DELETE ACL check that are enforced by the regular delete (OpCode 2) path. This is an authorization bypass / ACL enforcement bug.
This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper: from 3.9.0 through 3.9.5, from 3.8.0 through 3.8.6.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.6 or 3.8.7, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-79993"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T10:16:53Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The `deleteContainer` opcode (0x14/20) is processed without verifying the caller\u0027s ACL permissions, allowing any authenticated client to delete specific znodes in the data tree regardless of the ACL restrictions on the znode or its parent. This opcode is considered internal-only and the official client doesn\u0027t have API for it, but a\u00a0client that can open a plain TCP session on the ZooKeeper client port (2181 by default)\u00a0- with NO authentication and NO ACL permissions - can delete any\u00a0empty persistent znode (including regular persistent nodes, container\u00a0nodes, and TTL nodes) by issuing the raw protocol OpCode deleteContainer (20).\u00a0The deleteContainer request path completely skips both the session check and\u00a0the DELETE ACL check that are enforced by the regular delete (OpCode 2) path.\u00a0This is an authorization bypass / ACL enforcement bug.\n\nThis issue affects Apache ZooKeeper: from 3.9.0 through 3.9.5, from 3.8.0 through 3.8.6.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.6 or 3.8.7, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-9x9g-5r48-3wvg",
"modified": "2026-09-17T21:31:34Z",
"published": "2026-09-16T12:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-79993"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/9cw3rmrzhqpct26v8j18fy41bghlq8y5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/15/5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.