ghsa-cfcf-x7x2-gpf8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-12-17 00:00
Modified
2022-01-05 00:02
Details
An issue was discovered in Suricata before 6.0.4. It is possible to bypass/evade any HTTP-based signature by faking an RST TCP packet with random TCP options of the md5header from the client side. After the three-way handshake, it's possible to inject an RST ACK with a random TCP md5header option. Then, the client can send an HTTP GET request with a forbidden URL. The server will ignore the RST ACK and send the response HTTP packet for the client's request. These packets will not trigger a Suricata reject action.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-45098" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-16T05:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in Suricata before 6.0.4. It is possible to bypass/evade any HTTP-based signature by faking an RST TCP packet with random TCP options of the md5header from the client side. After the three-way handshake, it\u0027s possible to inject an RST ACK with a random TCP md5header option. Then, the client can send an HTTP GET request with a forbidden URL. The server will ignore the RST ACK and send the response HTTP packet for the client\u0027s request. These packets will not trigger a Suricata reject action.", "id": "GHSA-cfcf-x7x2-gpf8", "modified": "2022-01-05T00:02:11Z", "published": "2021-12-17T00:00:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45098" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/50e2b973eeec7172991bf8f544ab06fb782b97df" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://forum.suricata.io/t/suricata-6-0-4-and-5-0-8-released/1942" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/4710" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.