ghsa-cq85-4f5h-qqc4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-20 15:31
Modified
2024-11-20 00:32
Severity ?
Details
Set-Cookie response headers were being incorrectly honored in multipart HTTP responses. If an attacker could control the Content-Type response header, as well as control part of the response body, they could inject Set-Cookie response headers that would have been honored by the browser. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 123 and Firefox ESR < 115.8.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-1551" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-565" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-20T14:15:08Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Set-Cookie response headers were being incorrectly honored in multipart HTTP responses. If an attacker could control the Content-Type response header, as well as control part of the response body, they could inject Set-Cookie response headers that would have been honored by the browser. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 123 and Firefox ESR \u003c 115.8.", "id": "GHSA-cq85-4f5h-qqc4", "modified": "2024-11-20T00:32:08Z", "published": "2024-02-20T15:31:05Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1551" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1864385" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/03/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/03/msg00001.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-05" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-06" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-07" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.