GHSA-CQXR-X9W7-4G64

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:51 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:51
VLAI?
Details

Java Method Server (JMS) in EMC Documentum Content Server before 6.7SP1 P32, 6.7SP2 before P25, 7.0 before P19, 7.1 before P16, and 7.2 before P02 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by forging a signature for a query string that lacks the method_verb parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-4534"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-20T10:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Java Method Server (JMS) in EMC Documentum Content Server before 6.7SP1 P32, 6.7SP2 before P25, 7.0 before P19, 7.1 before P16, and 7.2 before P02 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by forging a signature for a query string that lacks the method_verb parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-cqxr-x9w7-4g64",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:51:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:51:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2015/Aug/86"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76410"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033296"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…