ghsa-crfc-rr25-6wf2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:05
Modified
2022-05-24 19:05
Severity ?
Details
In append_to_verify_fifo_interleaved_ of stream_encoder.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-174302683
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-0561" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-22T11:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In append_to_verify_fifo_interleaved_ of stream_encoder.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-174302683", "id": "GHSA-crfc-rr25-6wf2", "modified": "2022-05-24T19:05:56Z", "published": "2022-05-24T19:05:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-0561" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00022.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EWXBVMPPSL377I7YM55ZYXVKVMYOKES2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q4Y7BW35TGNFYBYBSBDSGLUJHHTYEUSG" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2021-06-01" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.