ghsa-f53j-pgm5-c4r3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-13 15:34
Modified
2024-07-08 15:31
Severity ?
Details
less through 653 allows OS command execution via a newline character in the name of a file, because quoting is mishandled in filename.c. Exploitation typically requires use with attacker-controlled file names, such as the files extracted from an untrusted archive. Exploitation also requires the LESSOPEN environment variable, but this is set by default in many common cases.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-32487", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-96", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-04-13T15:15:52Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "less through 653 allows OS command execution via a newline character in the name of a file, because quoting is mishandled in filename.c. Exploitation typically requires use with attacker-controlled file names, such as the files extracted from an untrusted archive. Exploitation also requires the LESSOPEN environment variable, but this is set by default in many common cases.", id: "GHSA-f53j-pgm5-c4r3", modified: "2024-07-08T15:31:54Z", published: "2024-04-13T15:34:58Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32487", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/gwsw/less/commit/007521ac3c95bc76e3d59c6dbfe75d06c8075c33", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00018.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240605-0009", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/13/2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/15/1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.