GHSA-F57C-FM3P-GGMF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-02 15:31 – Updated: 2025-05-02 18:31
VLAI?
Details

Lack of access controls in the 'ate' management binary of the Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform unauthorized configuration changes for any router where 'ate' has been enabled by sending a crafted UDP packet

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-46629"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T20:15:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Lack of access controls in the \u0027ate\u0027 management binary of the Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform unauthorized configuration changes for any router where \u0027ate\u0027 has been enabled by sending a crafted UDP packet",
  "id": "GHSA-f57c-fm3p-ggmf",
  "modified": "2025-05-02T18:31:31Z",
  "published": "2025-05-02T15:31:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-46629"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.uturn.dev/#/writeups/iot-village/tenda-rx2pro/README?id=cve-2025-46629-lack-of-authentication-in-ate"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.tendacn.com/us/default.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…