GHSA-FCVF-XXVP-WFJQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-03 15:31 – Updated: 2025-03-07 21:31
VLAI?
Details

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in softdiscover Zigaform – Price Calculator & Cost Estimation Form Builder Lite allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Zigaform – Price Calculator & Cost Estimation Form Builder Lite: from n/a through 7.4.2.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-26994"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-03T14:15:57Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027) vulnerability in softdiscover Zigaform \u2013 Price Calculator \u0026 Cost Estimation Form Builder Lite allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Zigaform \u2013 Price Calculator \u0026 Cost Estimation Form Builder Lite: from n/a through 7.4.2.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcvf-xxvp-wfjq",
  "modified": "2025-03-07T21:31:05Z",
  "published": "2025-03-03T15:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26994"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/zigaform-calculator-cost-estimation-form-builder-lite/vulnerability/wordpress-zigaform-price-calculator-cost-estimation-form-builder-lite-plugin-7-4-2-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…