ghsa-g3fq-pgcr-r7w6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:46
Modified
2022-05-17 03:46
Details
The idnsGrokReply function in Squid before 3.1.16 does not properly free memory, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon abort) via a DNS reply containing a CNAME record that references another CNAME record that contains an empty A record.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2011-4096", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2011-11-17T19:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The idnsGrokReply function in Squid before 3.1.16 does not properly free memory, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon abort) via a DNS reply containing a CNAME record that references another CNAME record that contains an empty A record.", id: "GHSA-g3fq-pgcr-r7w6", modified: "2022-05-17T03:46:33Z", published: "2022-05-17T03:46:33Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4096", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3237#c12", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46609", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/47459", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:193", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/01/3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1791.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026265", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/SQUID_3_1_16.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.