GHSA-GF34-2FPP-VMC4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-30 00:31 – Updated: 2025-02-07 18:31
VLAI?
Details

Clients using DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) can exhaust a DNS resolver's CPU and/or memory by flooding it with crafted valid or invalid HTTP/2 traffic. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.32, 9.20.0 through 9.20.4, 9.21.0 through 9.21.3, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.32-S1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-12705"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-29T22:15:28Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Clients using DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) can exhaust a DNS resolver\u0027s CPU and/or memory by flooding it with crafted valid or invalid HTTP/2 traffic.\nThis issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.32, 9.20.0 through 9.20.4, 9.21.0 through 9.21.3, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.32-S1.",
  "id": "GHSA-gf34-2fpp-vmc4",
  "modified": "2025-02-07T18:31:17Z",
  "published": "2025-01-30T00:31:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12705"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2024-12705"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250207-0003"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…