GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-GFJ5-979R-92PW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-18 17:22 – Updated: 2026-07-01 14:30
VLAI
Summary
@acastellon/auth: Authentication bypass via spoofable headers in validateToken()
Details

@acastellon/auth v2.2.0 appears to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers.

The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get('host').startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs.

Impact: An attacker may be able to access routes protected by validateToken() without a valid token. In deployments where downstream services trust auth-user or is-* headers, this may also lead to privilege escalation.

Affected package: @acastellon/auth v2.2.0

Affected code: auth.js, validateToken() The issue is related to the service-brother bypass and getHostName() check.

Example request:

GET /protected HTTP/1.1
Host: <configured CNAME or hostname>
auth-user: service-brother
is-admin: true

Expected behavior: The request should require a valid authentication token.

Actual behavior: The middleware calls next() before token validation.

Fix implemented in v2.3.0+:

Removed the spoofable bypass. Always sanitize incoming auth-user and is-* headers. Added mTLS client certificate based service auth (with optional TRUSTED_MTLS_SERVICES allowlist). Updated consumers (rest, graphql, dns-client) for mTLS support. Unit tests added for sanitization + mTLS path.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@acastellon/auth"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-58399"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-290"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T17:22:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "@acastellon/auth v2.2.0 appears to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers.\n\nThe validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get(\u0027host\u0027).startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs.\n\nImpact:\nAn attacker may be able to access routes protected by validateToken() without a valid token. In deployments where downstream services trust auth-user or is-* headers, this may also lead to privilege escalation.\n\nAffected package:\n@acastellon/auth v2.2.0\n\nAffected code:\nauth.js, validateToken()\nThe issue is related to the service-brother bypass and getHostName() check.\n\nExample request:\n```\nGET /protected HTTP/1.1\nHost: \u003cconfigured CNAME or hostname\u003e\nauth-user: service-brother\nis-admin: true\n```\n\nExpected behavior:\nThe request should require a valid authentication token.\n\nActual behavior:\nThe middleware calls next() before token validation.\n\nFix implemented in v2.3.0+:\n\nRemoved the spoofable bypass.\nAlways sanitize incoming auth-user and is-* headers.\nAdded mTLS client certificate based service auth (with optional TRUSTED_MTLS_SERVICES allowlist).\nUpdated consumers (rest, graphql, dns-client) for mTLS support.\nUnit tests added for sanitization + mTLS path.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfj5-979r-92pw",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T14:30:32Z",
  "published": "2026-06-18T17:22:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/antonio-castellon/module-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-gfj5-979r-92pw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/antonio-castellon/module-auth/issues/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/antonio-castellon/module-auth"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/@acastellon/auth/v/2.3.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "@acastellon/auth: Authentication bypass via spoofable headers in validateToken()"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…