GHSA-GFMF-6GHH-GJWR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-12 18:33 – Updated: 2025-02-06 21:32
VLAI?
Details

An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the the Public Key Infrastructure daemon (pkid) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated networked attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS).

The pkid is responsible for the certificate verification. Upon a failed verification, the pkid uses all CPU resources and becomes unresponsive to future verification attempts. This means that all subsequent VPN negotiations depending on certificate verification will fail.

This CPU utilization of pkid can be checked using this command:   root@srx> show system processes extensive | match pkid   xxxxx  root  103  0  846M  136M  CPU1  1 569:00 100.00% pkid

This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 20.4R3-S10; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S7; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S5; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S4; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S3; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R3-S1; 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R3; 23.2 versions prior to 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-30397"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-754"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-12T16:15:39Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the the\u00a0Public Key Infrastructure daemon (pkid) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated networked attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nThe pkid is responsible for the certificate verification. Upon a failed verification, the pkid uses all CPU resources and becomes unresponsive to future verification attempts. This means that all subsequent VPN negotiations depending on certificate verification will fail.\n\nThis CPU utilization of pkid can be checked using this command: \n\u00a0 root@srx\u003e show system processes extensive | match pkid\n\u00a0 xxxxx \u2003root \u2003103\u2003 0 \u2003846M \u2003136M \u2003CPU1 \u20031\u00a0569:00 100.00% pkid\n\nThis issue affects:\nJuniper Networks Junos OS\nAll\u00a0versions prior to 20.4R3-S10;\n21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S7;\n21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S5;\n22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S4;\n22.2 versions prior to\u00a022.2R3-S3;\n22.3 versions prior to\u00a022.3R3-S1;\n22.4 versions prior to\u00a022.4R3;\n23.2 versions prior to\u00a023.2R1-S2, 23.2R2.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfmf-6ghh-gjwr",
  "modified": "2025-02-06T21:32:05Z",
  "published": "2024-04-12T18:33:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30397"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA79179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…