GHSA-GP8F-8M3G-QVJ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-17 21:58 – Updated: 2024-09-18 14:28Impact
By sending a crafted HTTP request, it is possible to poison the cache of a non-dynamic server-side rendered route in the pages router (this does not affect the app router). When this crafted request is sent it could coerce Next.js to cache a route that is meant to not be cached and send a Cache-Control: s-maxage=1, stale-while-revalidate header which some upstream CDNs may cache as well.
To be potentially affected all of the following must apply:
- Next.js between 13.5.1 and 14.2.9
- Using pages router
- Using non-dynamic server-side rendered routes e.g.
pages/dashboard.tsxnotpages/blog/[slug].tsx
The below configurations are unaffected:
- Deployments using only app router
- Deployments on Vercel are not affected
Patches
This vulnerability was resolved in Next.js v13.5.7, v14.2.10, and later. We recommend upgrading regardless of whether you can reproduce the issue or not.
Workarounds
There are no official or recommended workarounds for this issue, we recommend that users patch to a safe version.
Credits
- Allam Rachid (zhero_)
- Henry Chen
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "next"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "13.5.1"
},
{
"fixed": "13.5.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "next"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "14.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.2.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46982"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-349",
"CWE-639"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-17T21:58:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-17T22:15:02Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nBy sending a crafted HTTP request, it is possible to poison the cache of a non-dynamic server-side rendered route in the pages router (this does not affect the app router). When this crafted request is sent it could coerce Next.js to cache a route that is meant to not be cached and send a `Cache-Control: s-maxage=1, stale-while-revalidate` header which some upstream CDNs may cache as well. \n\nTo be potentially affected all of the following must apply: \n\n- Next.js between 13.5.1 and 14.2.9\n- Using pages router\n- Using non-dynamic server-side rendered routes e.g. `pages/dashboard.tsx` not `pages/blog/[slug].tsx`\n\nThe below configurations are unaffected:\n\n- Deployments using only app router\n- Deployments on [Vercel](https://vercel.com/) are not affected\n\n\n### Patches\n\nThis vulnerability was resolved in Next.js v13.5.7, v14.2.10, and later. We recommend upgrading regardless of whether you can reproduce the issue or not.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no official or recommended workarounds for this issue, we recommend that users patch to a safe version.\n\n#### Credits\n\n- Allam Rachid (zhero_)\n- Henry Chen",
"id": "GHSA-gp8f-8m3g-qvj9",
"modified": "2024-09-18T14:28:54Z",
"published": "2024-09-17T21:58:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-gp8f-8m3g-qvj9"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46982"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/7ed7f125e07ef0517a331009ed7e32691ba403d3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/bd164d53af259c05f1ab434004bcfdd3837d7cda"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Next.js Cache Poisoning"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.